Biscutaceae


Ancestry: Mesozoic -> Podorhabdales -> Biscutaceae
Sister taxa: Axopodorhabdaceae, Biscutaceae, Calyculaceae, Cretarhabdaceae, Mazaganellaceae, Prediscosphaeraceae, Tubodiscaceae,

Short diagnosis: Regular placoliths; rim broad, central area relatively narrow, with variable central structures.
The distal shield is formed from V-units and the proximal shield and tube cycle are formed from R-units.


Daughter taxa (blue => in age window 0-300Ma) Granddaughter taxa
Elliptical with broad shields with or without a prominent inner tube cycle; the central-area may be imperforate or narrow and vacant or spanned by a simple structure (plate, cross or bar).

Asymmetric bAse, with large, hollow, flaring spines, closed distally by a domed covering

Elliptical, minute with diagonal cross suporting a hollow spine

Elliptical with prominent, birefringent, axial cross.

Circular, shields broad, usually without a prominent inner tube cycle; central-area typically narrow, may contain a spine.

Elliptical, large with broad shields; central area wide, spanned by a granular plate.

Elliptical with bicyclic rim and narrow central-area spanned by oblique transverse bar.

Circular with proximal shield wider than distal; spine with helical structure

Elliptical with slits between shield elements and axial cross

Elliptical with central-area spanned by broad platelets.

Subcircular-elliptical with smooth, grey appearance in XPL and a narrow, bright inner-cycle; central-area narrow and may be empty or spanned by an axial cross.

Elliptical with relatively wide central-area spanned by complex structure

Taxonomy:

Citation: Biscutaceae Black, 1971
Rank: Family
Notes & discussion: The taxonomic significance of conspicuous tube cycles has led to a variety of classification schemes within this family. In a study of the oldest (Early Jurassic) biscutaceans, de Kaenel & Bergen (1993) proposed considerable revision to this family, distinguishing Palaeopontosphaera(arguably a junior synonym of Biscutum) from Biscutum by the presence of a birefringent, distal inner-cycle. The type species holotype (EM) of Biscutum is a proximal view and thus the presence or absence of a tube cycle cannot be determined. Moreover, they argue that the aforementioned holotype is very nearly circular and emend the genus in such a way as to render it equivalent to Bidiscus Bukry, 1969 (?=Discorhabdus Noël, 1965) (i.e., circular to subcircular, unicyclic placoliths). The interpretation of these problematic holotype images is questionable. Here we follow Bown & Young (1997) and Bown (1998) retain the traditional usage of Biscutum, i.e. subcircular to elliptical biscutacean coccoliths which typically have a distal, inner tube cycle.

Farinacci & Howe catalog pages:

Short diagnosis: Regular placoliths; rim broad, central area relatively narrow, with variable central structures.
The distal shield is formed from V-units and the proximal shield and tube cycle are formed from R-units.


Morphology remarks: Placoliths with two broad shields that may or may not include a distal inner-cycle (tube cycle). The relatively narrow central areas are vacant, filled with granular calcite or spanned by variably oriented bars or axial cross-bars. The distal shield is formed from V-units and the proximal shield and tube cycle are formed from R-units; the distal shield elements are joined along radial or near-radial sutures (+/- 'kinks') and show little or no imbrication. The LM image is generally dark, but bright inner-cycles are common. Coccospheres are well known and usually spherical or cylindrical.

Geological Range:
Last occurrence (top): within Thanetian Stage (55.96-59.24Ma, top in Thanetian stage). Data source: Total of range of species in this database
First occurrence (base): within Sinemurian Stage (190.82-199.30Ma, base in Sinemurian stage). Data source: Total of range of species in this database

Plot of occurrence data:

References:

Black, M., (1971). Coccoliths of the Speeton Clay and Sutterby Marl. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 38: 381-424.

Bown, P.R. & Cooper, M.K.E., (1998). Jurassic. In: Bown, P.R. (Editor), Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy. British Micropalaeontological Society Publication Series. Chapman & Hall, pp. 34-85.

Bown, P.R. & Young, J.R., (1997). Mesozoic calcareous nannoplankton classification. Journal of Nannoplankton Research, 19(1): 21-36.

Bown 1998 328 pp [sorry, not in our bibliography yet]

Bukry, D., (1969). Upper Cretaceous coccoliths from Texas and Europe. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Article 51 (Protista 2): 1-79.

de Kaenel, E. & Bergen, J.A., (1993). New Early and Middle Jurassic coccolith taxa and biostratigraphy from the eastern proto-Atlantic (Morocco, Portugal and DSDP Site 547B). . Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 86(861-907).

Noël, D., (1965). Sur les Coccolithes du Jurassique Européen et d'Afrique du Nord. Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.


Nannotax3 - Mesozoic - Biscutaceae by: Jeremy R. Young, Paul R. Bown, Jacqueline A. Lees viewed: 30-5-2017

Taxon
Search
Search term: in module
Advanced
Search




Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first!

Add Comment

* Required information
1000
Captcha Image
Powered by Commentics