Discoaster pentaradiatus


Classification: Coccolithophores -> Discoasterales -> Discoasteraceae -> Discoaster -> D. pentaradiatus group -> Discoaster pentaradiatus
Sister taxa: D. pentaradiatus, D. prepentaradiatus, D. hamatus, D. bellus,

Taxonomy:

Citation: Discoaster pentaradiatus Tan, 1927
Rank: Species
Variants:
Synonyms:
Notes & discussion: Theodoridis (1984), argued that use of the name D. pentaradiatus for this species was based on a misconception of Tan's type specimen, and of Bramlette & Riedel's emended diagnosis. He proposed the alternative name E. misconceptus. This interpretation has not however been widely followed, and if an alternative name to D. pentaradiatus was used D. tridenus has priority over D. misconceptus.

Distinguishing features: Ray tips with acute bifurcations; strongly concavo-convex; birefringent

Farinacci & Howe catalog pages: Discoaster pentaradiatus + * , Discoaster anconitanus * , Eu-discoaster misconceptus * , Discoaster tridenus + * , Discoaster ono * , Discoaster quadramus * , Discoaster stradneri Cati and Borsetti *


Morphology remarks: 5-rayed discoaster (with rare 3 and 4 rayed variants); ray tips with acute bifurcations. Strongly concavo-convex and birefringent (each ray is a separate crystal-unit, with c-axes inclined slightly from vertical toward radial). The central area is small, but distinct. It often has scalloped depressions and/or sutural ridges on the distal side, also a stellate proximal knob.
This is a very distinctive species; both the acutely angled bifurcations and the birefringence, with each ray showing slightly different optical orientation are diagnostic of the species. With dissolution the bifurcations can be removed and such forms have been described as separate species (see synonyms), however the birefringence allows definitive identification of such specimens.

Search data:
TagsLITHS: nannolith-radiate, pentagonal, star-shaped, RIM: tips-bifurcate, free-rays-long, CA: process, PROCESS: boss, boss-proximal,
CSPH: not known, V-UNITS: all, V-prominent, R-UNITS: none,
MetricsLith size: 8->20µm; Segments: 5->5;
Sources: size from illustrated specs
The morphological data given here can be used on the advanced search page. See also these notes

Geological Range:
Notes: Often very abundant, but highly susceptible to dissolution. 
Raffi et al. (2006) record the FAD within NN10, at the base of chron C4An, and nearly coincident with the onset of th small Reticulofenestra event. However, there are definite records of the species below this, into NN9 (e.g. Browning et al. 2017), so this is probably better treated as a lowest common occurrence horizon, or possibly as a crossover with D. prepentaradiatus.
Last occurrence (top): at top of NN17 zone (100% up, 2.4Ma, in Gelasian stage). Data source: zonal marker (see e.g. Young 1998)
First occurrence (base): at base of Chron C4An sub-Magnetochron (0% up, 9.1Ma, in Tortonian stage). Data source: Raffi et al. 2006 (but this is LCO, rare occurrences persist to upper NN9 - e.g. Browning et al. (2017)

Plot of occurrence data:

  • Histogram - Neptune occurrence data from DSDP and ODP proceedings. Pale shading <50 samples in time bin. Interpret with caution & read these notes
  • Note to users in China - the diagram may not plot unless you use a VPN since I use google services on the website. If this is a problem please contact me 谢谢.
  • Taxon plotted: Discoaster pentaradiatus, synonyms included - Discoaster brouweri tridens; Discoaster misconceptus; Discoaster ono; Discoaster pentaradiatus; Discoaster pentaradiatus (fragments); Discoaster pentaradiatus (grainy); Discoaster quadramus; Discoaster tridenus;
  • space-time plot :: Samples map :: Parent: D. pentaradiatus group

    References:

    Borsetti, A. M. & Cati, F. (1972). Il Nannoplancton calcareo vivente nel Tirreno Centro-meridionale. Giornale di Geologia. 38(II): 395-452. gs

    Browning, E., Bergen, J. A., Blair, S. A., Boesiger, T. M. & de Kaenel, E. (2017). Late Miocene to Late Pliocene taxonomy and stratigraphy of the genus Discoaster in the circum North Atlantic Basin: Gulf of Mexico and ODP Leg 154. Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 37(2-3): 189-214. gs

    Bukry, D. (1973d). Phytoplankton stratigraphy, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 20, Western Pacific Ocean. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 20: 307-317. gs

    Cati, F. & Borsetti, A. M. (1970). I discoasteridi del Miocene delle Marche. Giornale di Geologia. 36(2): 617-652. gs

    Kamptner, E. (1967). Kalkflagellaten - Skelettreste aus Tiefseeschlamm des Südatlantischen Ozeans. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. 71: 117-198. gs

    Martini, E. & Bramlette, M. N. (1963). Calcareous nannoplankton from the experimental Mohole drilling. Journal of Paleontology. 37: 845-855. gs

    Müller, C. (1974b). Calcareous nannoplankton, Leg 25 (Western Indian Ocean). Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 25: 579-633. gs

    Muza, J. P., Wise, S. W. & Covington, J. M. (1987). Neogene calcareous nannofossils from Deep Sea Drilling Project Site 603, lower continental rise, western North Atlantic: biostratigraphy and correlation with magnetic and seismic stratigraphy. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 93: 593-616. gs

    Perch-Nielsen, K. (1972). Remarks on Late Cretaceous to Pleistocene coccoliths from the North Atlantic. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 12: 1003-1069. gs

    Perch-Nielsen, K. (1977). Albian to Pleistocene calcareous nannofossils from the Western South Atlantic, DSDP Leg 39. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 39: 699-823. gs

    Raffi, I. et al. (2006). A review of calcareous nannofossil astrobiochronology encompassing the past 25 million years. Quaternary Science Reviews. 25: 3113-3137. gs

    Tan, S. H. (1927a). Discoasteridae incertae sedis. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Sect Sci, 30: 411-419. gs

    Theodoridis, S. (1984). Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Miocene and revision of the helicoliths and discoasters. Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletin. 32: 1-271. gs

    Wei, W. (2003). Upper Miocene nannofossil bistratigraphy and taxonomy of Exxon core CH30-43-2 from the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 25(1): 17-23. gs

    Young, J. R. (1998). Neogene. In, Bown, P. R. (ed.) Calcareous Nannofossil Biostratigraphy. British Micropalaeontological Society Publication Series. 225-265. gs

    nannotaxlogo400px

    Discoaster pentaradiatus compiled by Jeremy R. Young, Paul R. Bown, Jacqueline A. Lees viewed: 26-2-2020

    Taxon Search:
    		Advanced Search

    Short stable page link: http://mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?id=493 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes
    Powered by Mikrotax taxonomy content management system developed by Jeremy Young


    Comments (1)

    Sort By
    Page 1 of 1
     
    Gravatar
    J Kell (Lincoln Nebraska, US)
    I don't believe either of these are D. pentaradiatus.

    [NB This comment refers to a pair of specimens illustrated by Young 1998 pl8 fig21 - this is the black and white set of four images in the collection of images on this page; JRY March 2014]
    Gravatar
    Jim Pospichal (Bug Ware, US)
    Hey jkell, if not D. pentaradiatus or the related D. ono, what do believe it is?
    Gravatar
    J Kell (Lincoln Nebraska, US)
    I didn't phrase my original statement the best. I should have explained myself. I only meant that I would have gone with the other names that have been mentioned now (D. ono and D. misconceptus). It seems clear that the specimens pictured have rays that behave as seperate crystals, it's just that when the name pentaradiatus comes to mind I always associate the bifurcated tips with that name too.
    Gravatar
    Jim Pospichal (Bug Ware, US)
    No problem. Was just curious if you had an alternate interpretation of the fossils. As far as bifurcations go, it could be that they are just not preserved in these specimens...i.e., the preservational artefact problem mentioned above. In regards to D. ono, Mike, is there some kind of metric we can use (e.g., length of free rays vs. width of central area)?
    Gravatar
    Mike Styzen (Noble Energy, US)
    I just looked up my description for D. ono in the Leg 135 volume. The lower photo, above, the one with the reallyshort rays,is mine. That's the holotype. That one is more typical. The paratype, not pictured here is a really good one with all the options, including a faint knob in the center. I didn't make that the holotype because good ones like that are hard to find, and I didn't want people to think they had to look like that to fit the species. I haven't thought about that for a really long time... Take a look at the photos with the description and you will see what I mean

    [NB The specimen illustrated in Young 1998 and on this page is not the actual  holotype but a very similar specimen - JRY March 2014]
    Gravatar
    Mike Styzen (Noble Energy, US)
    I've been on the fence myself about the possibility of D. ono being a preservational artifact. Generally they tend to be smaller than the central area of any of the well preserved D. pentaradiatus in the same sample. As I recall, I don't see D. ono all the way up to the extinction of D. pentaradiatus. If I had D. ono in the mix, I would call it At/Below that datum.
    Gravatar
    Simon Cole (PetroStrat, UK)
    We use Discoaster ono Styzen 1994 for a stubby version of D. pentaradiatus (or D. misconceptus sensu Theodoridis, 1984 as we call it). I would include the bottom two figs in D. ono though would probably sway more towards D. pentaradiatus for the top two. D. ono is probably just a preservation artefact of D. pentaradiatus but it's any easy split to make so we do anyway. Mike did you ever found any stratigraphic significance for the split?
    Gravatar
    Mike Styzen (Noble Energy, US)
    The specimens I illustrated with the description in the Leg 135 volume were intended to show the typical morphology (the holotype) and one with the longest rays in proportion to the central area that I would include in my species concept (the paratype). That's about as far as I went with it. The specimen illustrated above with the longer rays would not be D. ono.
    Notify Me
    Page 1 of 1
     
    Share a link to this comment

    Add Comment

    * Required information
    1000
    Captcha Image
    Powered by Commentics