nmn

Rugotruncana


Classification: pf_mesozoic -> Rugoglobigerinidae -> Rugotruncana
Sister taxa: Archaeoglobigerina, Bucherina, Kuglerina, Plummerita, Rugoglobigerina, Rugotruncana, Trinitella,
Daughter taxa: (blue => in age window 0-300Ma)



Specimens which cannot be assigned to established species

Taxonomy

Citation: Rugotruncana Brönnimann and Brown 1956
Rank: Genus
Basionym: Rugotruncana tilevi
Type species: Rugotruncana tilevi Brönnimann and Brown, 1956
Taxonomic discussion: The revised definition of this genus given by Pessagno (1967, *2387, p. 368) stated, in part "coarse rugosities or costellae, always arranged in a distinctive meridorial [sic] pattern, present on the surface of the test," but does not agree with the characters of the type species. Topotypes of R. tilevi (received from N. K. Brown) do not have the meridional alignment of costellae shown in the original drawing. Furthermore, as was correctly shown in the original illustrations, the chambers of R. tilevi are much more globular and the costae more widely spaced than in Globotruncana circumnodifer subsp. subcircumnodifer Gandolfi, hence the two species are not synonymous as had been stated by Pessagno, and R. tilevi remains the correct name for the type species of Rugotruncana.

Type images:

Original description: Rugotruncana: The calcareous hyaline test is trochospirally coiled. The small early chambers are globular, inflated, and globigerine-like. Later chambers are very slightly to strongly flattened and exhibit a keeled, imperiorate, peripheral band. The early chambers are smooth walled, but some or all later chambers exhibit fine discontinuous costellae or traces of costellae. The principal aperture is rounded, interiomarginal, and opens into a relatively large umbilicus. Long apertural flaps extend into the umbilicus, and in later chambers form a protruded, imperforate, umbilical cover-plate with accessory apertures.

Entries in the Catalog of original descriptions: Rugotruncana;

Distinguishing features: Test with a low trochospiral coil, early chambers subglobular and inflated, later chambers slightly compressed, sutures curved on the spiral side and continuous with the peripheral carina, straight, radial, and depressed on the umbilical side, umbilicus wide, periphery with double-keeled imperforate carinal band; wall calcareous, finely perforate, surface strongly pustulose, adjacent pustules may coalesce into short costellae without distinct alignment, although resulting in a rugose surface; primary aperture interiomarginal, umbilical, elongate portici in the early chambers, later with distinctly protruding tegilla provided with accessory apertures.

Geological Range:
Last occurrence (top): within Maastrichtian Stage (66.04-72.05Ma, top in Maastrichtian stage). Data source: Total of range of species in this database
First occurrence (base): within Campanian Stage (72.05-83.64Ma, base in Campanian stage). Data source: Total of range of species in this database

Plot of occurrence data:

Dec 2017 - Plotting of Neptune data has been re-enabled on the Mesozoic pages following revision of the age-models in Neptune. The data is, however, still very sparse for the Early Cretaceous

References:

Loeblich, A.R. & Tappan, H., (1988). Foraminiferal Genera and Their Classification (Volume I-II)Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1059 pp.


logo

Rugotruncana compiled by the pforams@mikrotax project team viewed: 22-9-2018

Taxon Search:
Advanced Search
Short stable page link: http://mikrotax.org/pforams/index.php?id=110509Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes



Comments (1)

Sort By
Page 1 of 1
 
Gravatar
Le Coze

The taxonomic discussion states that G. tilevi remains the correct name for the type species of Rugotruncana but it is included in the synonyms of G. circumnodifer?

Gravatar
Jeremy Young (UK)

Indeed, I will point his out to Brian

Page 1 of 1
 

Add Comment

* Required information
1000
Captcha Image
Powered by Commentics