views1
Original descriptions of taxa. For coccolithophores, and many calcispheres, these are pages from the Farinacci & Howe Catalog of Calcareous Nannofossils. In other cases (e.g. non-calcifying haptophytes) the data is directly compiled on this site. The "Catalogue of Calcareous Nannofossils" was originally compiled by Prof A. Farinacci 1969-1989, since 2000 it has been updated and extended by Richard Howe - see The Farinacci and Howe Catalog - an Introduction.
Taxa are sorted alphabetically for simple browsing, or you can use search boxes at the top & bottom of the page
Current identification/main database link: Noelaerhabdaceae Jerkovic, 1970 emend. Young & Bown, 1997
Compiled data
Original Description
(Gephyrocapsaceae: Coccolithophorales placolithos ellipticos ferentes; in medio coccolitho foramen amplum; pali geminorum scutorum commissuris orthogoniis. Genus typicum: Gephyrocapsa Kamptner.)
Extra details from original publication
In the Pleistocene, Mclntyre (1967) has found coccoliths intermediate in form between Gephyrocapsa oceanica and C. huxleyi, and he has given reasons for believing that C. huxleyi has evolved from the Gephyrocapsa stock. Recent work suggests that all these forms are closely related, and that they belong to a family that was actively evolving during the Pleistocene, independently of the Coccolithophoraceae. The name Gephyrocapsaceae is proposed for this family, with the following diagnosis: Coccolithophorales bearing placoliths with a large central opening and with the shields constructed of non-imbricate radial elements. Typical genus Gephyrocapsa Kamptner. (Gephyrocapsaceae: Coccolithophorales placolithos ellipticos ferentes; in medio coccolitho foramen amplum; pali geminorum scutorum commissuris orthogoniis. Genus typicum: Gephyrocapsa Kamptner.)
Coccoliths with a similar structure are abundant in the Tertiary; C. marismontium in the Middle Eocene has much in common with some variants of C. doronicoides, and there are forms in the Miocene and Pliocene which appear to link the two together. An independent generic name is needed for the C. doronicoides and C. marismontium complex of species, in which the placoliths have a large open centre and in which both shields consist of numerous non-imbricate rays. The earliest generic name other than Coccolithus which has been proposed for a coccolith of this kind appears to be Ellipsoplacolithus Kamptner. Loeblich and Tappan (1966, p. 139), invoking Article 34 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, have regarded this name as not having been validly published. Nevertheless, when Kamptner (1963, p. 171) proposed Ellipsoplacolithus as a new genus, he gave a diagnosis in which it is treated as an organ-genus, and designated E. lacunosus Kamptner as type species. The name is thus provisional only in the same sense that all organ-genera are provisional, but not within the meaning of Article 34. If we therefore accept it as a legitimate name, Coccolithus doronicoides becomes Ellipsoplacolithus doronicoides (Black and Barnes) n. comb., and C. marismontium becomes E. marismontium (Black) n. comb.
The central opening of Gephyrocapsa is spanned distally by an oblique bridge, and proximally by a grille. A similar grille, but without a bridge, is present in C. huxleyi and in a large number of Tertiary species of Tremalithus as defined by the genotype, T. placomorphus. Reticulofenestra Hay, Mohler and Wade, and Dictyococcites Black differ very little from Tremalithus Kamptner, and probably ought to be merged into this genus.
All the forms discussed above fall quite naturally into the Gephyrocapsaceae. In the Cretaceous, there is an interesting complex of species whose relationships are not so clear-cut. They reach their greatest diversity in the Albian and Cenomanian, where there are forms with a bewildering combination of characters, some suggestive of the Gephyrocapsaceae, others of the Ellipsagelosphaeraceae. Much work will be needed before these can be satisfactorily sorted out; it may well be that we have here a record of an evolutionary divergence amongst whose products were the ancestors of the gephyrocapsoid stock that did not become clearly differentiated until the Tertiary.
Editors' Notes
Black, M. (1971c). The systematics of coccoliths in relation to the paleontological record. In, Funnell, B. M. & Riedel, W. R. (eds) The Micropaleontology of the Oceans. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 611-624. gs O Hay, W. W. (1977). Calcareous nannofossils. In, Ramsay, A. T. S. (ed.) Oceanic Micropalaentology. Academic Press, London (2): 1055-1200. gsReferences:
Gephyrocapsaceae: Catalog entry compiled by <% compiler %>. Viewed: 26-1-2025
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?id=55309 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments