Taxonomy:
There has been a tendency toward recognition of ever more sphenolith "species", but it is by no means clear that these reflect biological species, as discussed by Towe (1979).
See also - Perch-Nielsen 1985; Aubry 1989; Maiorano & Monechi 1997; Shamrock 201; Bergen et al. 2017; Howe 2021
Distinguishing features:
Parent taxon (Sphenolithaceae): Conical discoasteralids with a concave base, consisting of a mass of elements radiating from a common origin.
This taxon: Conical nannoliths with a concave base, consisting of a mass of elements radiating from a common origin.
Farinacci & Howe catalog pages: Sphenolithus + * , Sphenaster * , Nannoturbella *
Morphology:
LITHS: nannolith-radiate, circular, cylindrical, CROSS-POLARS: R-prominent, |
Lith size: 4->20µm; |
Geological Range:
Last occurrence (top): at top of NN16 zone (100% up, 2.5Ma, in Gelasian stage). Data source: Total of ranges of the species in this database
First occurrence (base): within NP4 zone (61.51-63.25Ma, base in Danian stage). Data source: Total of ranges of species in this database
Plot of occurrence data:
Aubry, M. -P. (1989a). Handbook of Cenozoic calcareous nannoplankton. Book 3: Ortholithae (Pentaliths, and others), Heliotithae (Fasciculiths, Sphenoliths and others). Micropaleontology Press, American Museum of Natural History, New York. 1-279. gs Bergen, J. A., de Kaenel, E., Blair, S. A., Boesiger, T. M. & Browning, E. (2017). Oligocene-Pliocene taxonomy and stratigraphy of the genus Sphenolithus in the circum North Atlantic Basin: Gulf of Mexico and ODP Leg 154. Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 37(2-3): 77-112. gs O Bown, P. R. & Dunkley Jones, T. (2012). Calcareous nannofossils from the Paleogene equatorial Pacific (IODP Expedition 320 Sites U1331-1334). Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 32(2): 3-51. gs O Deflandre, G. (1952). Classe des Coccolithophoridés. (Coccolithophoridae. Lohmann, 1902). In, Grassé, P. P. (ed.) Traité de Zoologie. Masson, Paris 439-470. gs Howe, R. (2021). Ultrastructure and taxonomy of the family Sphenolithaceae. Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 39(1): 29-75. gs O Maiorano, P. & Monechi, S. (1997). New Early Miocene species of Sphenolithus Deflandre, 1952 from the North Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 19(2): 103-107. gs Martini, E. (1965). Mid-Tertiary calcareous nannoplankton from Pacific deep-sea cores. Colston Papers. 17: 393-411. gs O Perch-Nielsen, K. (1985). Cenozoic calcareous nannofossils. In, Bolli, H. M., Saunders, J. B. & Perch-Nielsen, K. (eds) Plankton Stratigraphy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1): 427-555. gs Romein, A. J. T. (1979). Lineages in Early Paleogene calcareous nannoplankton. Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletin. 22: 1-231. gs O Towe, K. M. (1979). Variation and systematics in calcareous nannofossils of the genus Sphenolithus. American Zoologist. 19: 555-572. gs Wilcoxon, J. A. (1970). Sphenaster new genus, a Pliocene calcareous nannofossil from the tropical Indo-Pacific. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology. 8: 78-81. gs References:
Sphenolithus compiled by Jeremy R. Young, Paul R. Bown, Jacqueline A. Lees viewed: 20-9-2024
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?id=1277 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments (4)
The reported Gelasian occurrence seems to be based on the PDBD record at https://paleobiodb.org/classic/basicCollectionSearch?collection_no=152368&is_real_user=1. However, the actual ODP record clearly states the actual age for the Sphenolithus specimens. As this PDBD entry also identifies Emiliania huxleyi as a bivalve and wrongly reports it from the Gelasian as well, the PDBD needs editing.
Hi
Thanks for the comment - the posting was delayed because comments with links need to be approved (otherwise we get flooded with spam). We don't use PBDB at all - there is not much useful nannofossil data on it. The range into the Gelasian for Sphenolithus is in fact a rounding problem - S. abies gets into NN16 and NN16 extends into the Gelasian. So, I should emend the code which summarises ranges for higher taxa. In most cases rounding to stage level makes sense but occasionally, as here, it produces unfortunate errors.
Jeremy