Taxonomy:
De Kaenel & Mojon (2023) separate C. ellipticus from U. detecta on the grounds that the distal shield elements are visible in phase contrast in C. ellipticus but not in U. detecta. They document the two forms as overlapping in range but state that the LAD of U. detecta, within NP21, is of stratigraphic value.
Distinguishing features:
Parent taxon (Umbilicosphaera): Central area open
This taxon: Medium to large (~5-9 microns), elliptical placolith coccoliths with narrow bicyclic rim (in XPL) and wide, apparently vacant, central area. The rim width is around half that of the central area (rim width/central area width: 0.5-0.7).
Farinacci & Howe catalog pages: E. detecta * , C. ellipticus *
Search data:
LITHS: placolith, elliptical, CA: vacant, CSPH: equant, monomorphic, CROSS-POLARS: rim-bicyclic, V-prominent, R-prominent, |
Lith size: 5->9µm; |
Geological Range:
Notes: Bown & Newsam (2017) argue that there is a disjunct range betwen Oligo-Miocene forms (U. detecta) and Middle Eocene forms (U. elliptica). Shamrock & Watkins (2012), however, reported occurrences throughout the Eocne (NP14 to NP21).
Last occurrence (top): within Miocene Epoch (5.33-23.03Ma, top in Messinian stage). Data source: de Kaenel & Villa, 1996
First occurrence (base): within NP14b subzone (46.29-47.84Ma, base in Lutetian stage). Data source: Shamrock & Watkins (2012)
Plot of occurrence data:
Bown, P. R. & Dunkley Jones, T. (2012). Calcareous nannofossils from the Paleogene equatorial Pacific (IODP Expedition 320 Sites U1331-1334). Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 32(2): 3-51. gs O Bown, P. R. & Newsam, C. (2017). Calcareous nannofossils from the Eocene North Atlantic Ocean (IODP Expedition 342 Sites U1403–1411). Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 37(1): 25-60. gs O De Kaenel, E. & Mojon, P. -O. (2023). Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Eocene/Oligocene boundary (Zones NP19–21) in the parautochthonous Subalpine UMM of the Swiss Molasse Basin (Canton Fribourg, Western Switzerland). Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 41(2): 64-96. gs O de Kaenel, E. & Villa, G. (1996). Oligocene-Miocene calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy and paleoeecology from the Iberian Abyssal Plain. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results. 149: 79-145. gs O Jones, A. P. & Dunkley Jones, T. (2020). Middle Eocene to Early Oligocene calcareous nannofossils from the Nanggulan Formation, Java, Indonesia. Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 38(1): 57-79. gs Perch-Nielsen, K. (1977). Albian to Pleistocene calcareous nannofossils from the Western South Atlantic, DSDP Leg 39. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 39: 699-823. gs O Shamrock, J. L. & Watkins, D. K. (2012). Eocene calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy and community structure from Exmouth Plateau, Eastern Indian Ocean (ODP Site 762). Stratigraphy. 9(1): 1-11. gs Young, J. R. & Bown, P. R. (2014). Some emendments to calcareous nannoplankton taxonomy. Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 33(1): 39-46. gs References:
Umbilicosphaera detecta compiled by Jeremy R. Young, Paul R. Bown, Jacqueline A. Lees viewed: 16-9-2024
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?id=1464 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments