Distinguishing features:
Parent taxon (Calyculaceae): Elevated placoliths, tube tall and proximal shield reduced; central-area with variable proximal cover.
The distal shield is formed from V-units and the proximal shield from R-units. Commonly observed in side view.
This taxon: High, broad, flaring distal-shield composed of radial, non-imbricating elements, and a proximal-shield which is often reduced to a simple, narrow cycle of elements; central-area structures are highly variable, including numerous bars, concentric structures, nets and grills.
Daughter taxa (time control age-window is: 0-800Ma)![]() | |||||
Calyculus - late Jurassic Broadly elliptical, with 8-10 radial bars in central area. | |||||
Central area with lozenge & cross-bars (Calyculus) | |||||
![]() | Calyculus cribrum Elliptical Calyculus ; rim moderately elevated; central area with axial cross,concentric lozenge. | ||||
Calyculus depressus Small elliptical Calyculus; rim low & narrow; central area with axial cross and concentric lozenge. | |||||
Central area with radial bars (Vikosphaera) | |||||
![]() | ![]() | Calyculus noeliae Calyculus with central area with around 14-20 lateral bars. Rim elevation very variable, even on a single coccosphere | |||
Central area with lozenge, cross-bars & radial bars (Catillus) | |||||
![]() | Calyculus hommerili Elliptical Calyculus ; rim low; central area with axial cross; concentric lozenge and short radial bars | ||||
![]() | Calyculus serrai Elliptical Calyculus; rim moderately elevated; central area with axial cross, small lozenge and long radial bars. | ||||
Central area with grill (Incerniculum) | |||||
![]() | ![]() | Calyculus absolutus Elliptical Calyculus; rim moderately elevated, narrow; central area with finely perforate net and spine-base | |||
Calyculus derivatus Elliptical Calyculus ;rim moderately elevated; central area with axial cross finely perforate net and large spine-base | |||||
Calyculus magnus Large (ca 6-8 µm across), broadly elliptical Calyculus; rim elevated, broad; central area with grill | |||||
Calyculus sp. Specimens not identified to species level. NB Late Jurassic specimens are grouped separately. |
Taxonomy:
The genera Proculithus, Incerniculum, Vikosphaera and Catillus were proposed based on variations in central area structure, Bown (1987) and Crux (1987) both argued that this was impractical, and that such characters were better used at specific level. Nonetheless, it is useful to sort the species out into the categories proposed by Goy in order to understand the taxonomy - this is what I have done in the table [JRY]
Farinacci & Howe catalog pages: Calyculus + * , Proculithus * , Incerniculum * , Vikosphaera * , Catillus *
Distinguishing features:
Parent taxon (Calyculaceae): Elevated placoliths, tube tall and proximal shield reduced; central-area with variable proximal cover.
The distal shield is formed from V-units and the proximal shield from R-units. Commonly observed in side view.
This taxon: High, broad, flaring distal-shield composed of radial, non-imbricating elements, and a proximal-shield which is often reduced to a simple, narrow cycle of elements; central-area structures are highly variable, including numerous bars, concentric structures, nets and grills.
Morphology:
LITHS: placolith, elliptical, hollow, CA: concentric-ring(s), cross-axial, grill, ca_disjunct, CROSS-POLARS: V-prominent, rim-unicyclic, |
Lith size: 3->8µm; Data source notes: size range of included species |
Geological Range:
Last occurrence (top): at top of Oxfordian Stage (100% up, 154.8Ma, in Oxfordian stage). Data source: Total of ranges of the species in this database
First occurrence (base): within Late Pliensbachian Substage (184.20-188.00Ma, base in Pliensbachian stage). Data source: Total of ranges of species in this database
Plot of occurrence data:
Bown, P. R. & Cooper, M. K. E. (1998). Jurassic. In, Bown, P. R. (ed.) Calcareous Nannofossil Biostratigraphy. British Micropalaeontological Society Publication Series . 34-85. gs O Bown, P. R. & Young, J. R. (1997). Mesozoic calcareous nannoplankton classification. Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 19(1): 21-36. gs Bown, P. R. (1987a). Taxonomy, evolution, and biostratigraphy of Late Triassic-Early Jurassic calcareous nannofossils. Special Papers in Palaeontology. 38: 1-118. gs Crux, J. A. (1987a). Concerning dimorphism in Early Jurassic coccoliths and the origin of the genus Discorhabdus Noël 1965. Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt. 39: 51-55. gs Goy, G., Noël, D. & Busson, G. (1979). Les conditions de sédimentation des schistes-carton (Toarcien inf.) du bassin de Paris déduites de l'étude des nannofossiles calcaires et des diagraphies. Document des Laboratoires de Géologie de la Faculté des Sciences de Lyon. 75: 33-57. gs O Medd, A. W. (1979). The Upper Jurassic coccoliths from the Haddenham and Gamlingay boreholes (Cambridgeshire, England). Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae. 72: 19-109. gs O Noël, D. (1973). Nannofossiles calcaires de sédiments jurassiques finement laminés. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris. 75 [1972]: 95-156. gs References:
![]() |
Calyculus compiled by Jeremy R. Young, Paul R. Bown, Jacqueline A. Lees viewed: 29-4-2025
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?id=10183 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |
![]() |
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments (2)
Dear Jeremy,
The original diagnosis of Calyculus and Calyculus cribum is in Noël D., 1972 not 1973.
In the Farinacci & Howe catalog the genus and the species author appears as Noël, 1972.
The publication is the same for L. barozii (I have sent a comment about it a minute ago).
Kind regards,
Mica
Hi Mica - the paper was actually published in 1973 even though the cover date is1972, for taxonomy we need use the correct date. I discuss this a bit further in my reply to your other comment
Jeremy