Cenozoic and Modern Coccolithophores

Classification: ntax_cenozoic
Sister taxa:

Daughter taxa (time control age-window is: 0-800Ma)Granddaughter taxa
Heterococcoliths mostly placoliths with R-unit dominant. Motile phases with vestigial haptonema.

Mostly placolith heterococcoliths, with V-unit forming the distal shield; R-unit the proximal shield.

Heterococcoliths with V-units forming upper/outer cycle of imbricated elements and R-units forming basal plate and central mass of irregular elements

Coccoliths with radial lath cycle of T-units, and disjunct, often complex, axial structure, coccospheres often polymorphic

Coccolith families inc sed
Various heterococcolith groups not obviously related to the well-defined orders

Mesozoic Survivors
Mesozoic taxa which occur in low abundances in the early Palaeogene.

Holococcoliths & Nannoliths
Haploid life-cycle stages, with liths formed of numerous rhombohedral microcrystals

Diploid (?) life-cycle stage covered by pentaliths (plates formed of 5 segments with lamellar sub-structure) formed extracellualrly

Radially symmetrical nannoliths formed from one to several separate cycles of elements that radiate from a common centre or axis.

Nannolith families inc sed
Haptophytes forming calcareous structures not obviously homologous with heterococcoliths, holococcoliths, or discoasteralids


Citation: Coccolithophores informal
Rank: overall group
Taxonomic discussion: Coccolithophore classification is primarily based on the calcareous coccoliths they produce. The structure and mineralogy of coccoliths is very tightly controlled during the, intracellular, coccolith-formation process and so coccolith structure has proven a remarkably robust classification tool, well supported by modern molecular-genetic data. It also means biologists and palaeontologists use the same classification.

There are complications however, most obviously, typical coccolithophores have haplo-diplontic life-cycles with different coccoliths produced in haploid and diploid phases. The diploid phase heterococcoliths have complex structures formed of radial arrays of interlocking crystal units usually with alternating vertical and radial crystallographic orientations (V/R model). The different rim-structures of these heterococcoliths form the essential basis of the classification. The haploid phase holococcoliths are beautifully organised arrays of rhombohedral crystallites, but their morphology is relatively plastic and does not yield useful phylogenetic data. Finally, some other nannofossils occur which do not obviously fit either the heterococcolith or holococcolith model and these are conventionally refered to as nannoliths.

Understanding the classification of coccolithophores thus requires some basic knowledge of coccolithophore life-cycles, biomineralisation, crystallography and optical mineralogy (to interpret cross-polarised light images). A useful overview is provided by Bown & Young (1998) and other references which help explain the system applied here are listed below.

Distinguishing features: Extant coccolithophores and Cenozoic calcareous nannofossils - Mesozoic nannofossils are in a separate module

Farinacci & Howe catalog pages: Coccolithophores [no catalog entry yet]

Search data:
MetricsLith size: 0->0µm;
The morphological data given here can be used on the advanced search page. See also these notes

Geological Range:
Last occurrence (top): Extant Data source: Total of range of species in this database
First occurrence (base): at top of No known fossil record modern (100% up, 0Ma, in "Holocene" stage). Data source: Total of range of species in this database

Plot of occurrence data:


Bown, P. R. & Young, J. R. (1998a). Introduction - calcareous nannoplankton biology. In, Bown, P. R. (ed.) Calcareous Nannofossil Biostratigraphy. British Micropalaeontological Society Publication Series. 1-15. gs

Young, J. R., Didymus, J. M., Bown, P. R., Prins, B. & Mann, S. (1991a). Crystal assembly and phylogenetic evolution in heterococcoliths. Nature. 356: 516-518. gs

Young, J. R. et al. (1997). Guidelines for coccolith and calcareous nannofossil terminology. Palaeontology. 40: 875-912. gs V O

Young, J. R., Davis, S. A., Bown, P. R. & Mann, S. (1999). Coccolith ultrastructure and biomineralisation. Journal of Structural Biology. 126: 195-215. gs

Young, J. R., Geisen, M., Cros, L., Kleijne, A., Probert, I. & Ostergaard, J. B. (2003). A guide to extant coccolithophore taxonomy. Journal of Nannoplankton Research, Special Issue. 1: 1-132. gs V O

Young, J. R., Geisen, M. & Probert, I. (2005). A review of selected aspects of coccolithophore biology with implications for palaeobiodiversity estimation. Micropaleontology. 51(4): 267-288. gs


Cenozoic and Modern Coccolithophores compiled by Jeremy R. Young, Paul R. Bown, Jacqueline A. Lees viewed: 28-7-2021

Taxon Search:
Advanced Search

Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?id=315 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes

Comments (0)

No comments yet on this page. Please do add comments if you spot any problems, or have information to share

Add Comment

* Required information
Captcha Image
Powered by Commentics