Variant: Discoaster moorei is regarded here as a variant of Discoaster exilis.
I.e. It is a subjective junior synonym, but some workers many find it useful for some studies (e.g. experienced biostratigraphers working with abundant, well preserved material), but for most purposes differentiating it is not reccomended. Please do use the comments section at the bottom of this page if you wish to discuss this interpretation
Taxonomy:
Distinguishing features:
Parent taxon (Discoaster exilis): Small central-area; usually with weak distal and proximal bosses; bifurcations acutely angled in plan-view
This taxon: Asymetric 5-rayed discoaster with bifurcations.
Farinacci & Howe catalog pages: D. moorei *
Morphology:
| LITHS: nannolith-radiate, asymmetric, star-shaped, CROSS-POLARS: 1ou, V-prominent, |
| Lith size: 8->18µm; Segments: 5->5; Data source notes: size from OD |
Geological Range:
Notes: Specimens can occur throughout the Miocene, and even the Oligocene, but more characteristic of the mid Miocene
Last occurrence (top): within NN5 zone (13.53-14.91Ma, top in Serravallian stage). Data source: Perch-Nielsen 1985
First occurrence (base): within NN4 zone (14.91-17.95Ma, base in Burdigalian stage). Data source: Perch-Nielsen 1985
Plot of occurrence data:
![]() |
Discoaster moorei compiled by Jeremy R. Young, Paul R. Bown, Jacqueline A. Lees viewed: 16-11-2025
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?id=484 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments (3)
The 3 pictures should probably be put in D. leroyi, 5 rays D. deflandrei
Hi Alessandro
I am sceptical about the utility of either species but yes you are right, these images are more like 5 rayed delfandrei, i have now moved them.
thank you Jeremy
None of those photos above look like what I would call Disaster moorei. the photos on the right and left are symmetrical, probably 5 rayed D. deflandrei, and the one in the center is overgrown to the point I' wouldn't use it. Look at the photo on page 475 of Perch Nielsen in Plankton Stratigraphy if you want a better idea of what it really should look like.