Sub-taxa & variants (time control age-window is: 0-800Ma)![]() | Granddaughter taxa | ||||
| Umbellosphaera tenuis type I Coccoliths with distinct sutural ridges and numerous finer papillate secondary ridges | |||||
| Umbellosphaera tenuis type II Sutural and secondary ridges papillate. | |||||
| Umbellosphaera tenuis type III Sutural and secondary ridges heavily calcified | |||||
| Umbellosphaera tenuis type IV Sutural ridges well calcified near centre of coccolith, lower toward periphery. Numerous secondary ridges, often anastamosing. | |||||
| Umbellosphaera tenuis type O Cocoliths smooth - resemble U. irregularis in distal view but have the characteristic convex profile of U. tenuis. Liths are often very thin/weakly calcified. | |||||
This form is substantially more robust than U. irregularis and is much more common in the fossil record.
The coccoliths of this species vary significantly between coccospheres, in terms of ridge thickness, presence of papillae (nodes) on the ridges, number of secondary ridges, and degree of bimodality in ridge thickness. Based on this Kleijne (1993) distinguished several types of U. tenuis. This work has not been followed up by a detailed study and these types are arguably intergradational. Nonetheless, most specimens are readily assignable to a single type, so it seems possible that they will prove to be discrete (sub) species. (NB Subdivision of type III into IIIa and IIIb is from Young et al. 2003)
Distinguishing features:
Parent taxon (Umbellosphaera): Coccoliths trumpet-shaped
This taxon: Coccoliths convex outwards, relatively heavily calcified, with ridges on the distal surface.
Liths convex distally; distal surface usually with pattern of ridges; major ridges sub-radial running along sutures; secondary ridges diverge anticlockwise from them.
Proxmil shield is normally narrow, often missing, and dificult to detect in LM.
| LITHS: placolith, asymmetric, elliptical, CA: ca_conjunct, plate, closed, CSPH: equant, BC-dimorphic, CROSS-POLARS: rim-unicyclic, R-prominent, |
| Lith size: 2->9µm; Coccosphere size: 8->12µm; Liths per sphere: 15->25 Data source notes: lith size from Kleijne 1993; lith numbers from Yang & Wei 2003, range inferred from single estimate |
U. tenuis is much less common in Holocene sediments than in the plankton, probably because the coccoliths readily disintegrate and dissolve. They are nonetheless reasonably frequent in the Quaternary, but there are few pre-Pliocene records. It is conceivable that they have become more abundant since extinction of the discoasters which may have occupied a similar ologitrophic niche.
Plot of occurrence data:
Black, M. & Barnes, B. (1961). Coccoliths and discoasters from the floor of the South Atlantic Ocean. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society. 80: 137-147. gs Boudreaux, J. E. & Hay, W. W. (1969). Calcareous nannoplankton and biostratigraphy of the late Pliocene-Pleistocene-Recent sediments in the Submarex cores. Revista Española de Micropaleontología. 1(3): 249-292. gs O Heimdal, B. R. & Gaarder, K. R. (1981). Coccolithophorids from the northern part of the eastern central Atlantic II. Heterococcolithophorids. “Meteor” Forschungsergebnisse. 33: 37-69. gs Kamptner, E. (1937). Neue und bemerkenswerte Coccolithineen aus dem Mittelmeer. Archiv für Protistenkunde. 89: 279-316. gs Kleijne, A. (1993b). Morphology, Taxonomy and distribution of extant coccolithophorids (Calcareous nannoplankton). PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. 1-321. gs Markali, J. & Paasche, E. (1955). On two species of Umbellosphaera, a new marine coccolithophorid genus. Nytt Magasin for Botanikk. 4: 95-100. gs Müller, C. (1974). Calcareous nannoplankton, Leg 25 (Western Indian Ocean). Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 25: 579-633. gs Reid, F. M. H. (1980). Coccolithophorids of the North Pacific Central Gyre with notes on their vertical and seasonal distribution. Micropaleontology. 26(2): 151-176. gs Samtleben, C. (1978). Pliocene-Pleistocene coccolith assemblages from Sierra Leone Rise - Site 366, Leg 41. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 41(16): 913-931. gs Yang, T. -N., Wei, K. & Wu, J. -T. (2012). Marine coccolithophores around Taiwan. Biodiversity Research Center, Academica Sinica, Taipei. 1-96. gs Young, J. R. (1998). Neogene. In, Bown, P. R. (ed.) Calcareous Nannofossil Biostratigraphy. British Micropalaeontological Society Publication Series . 225-265. gs Young, J. R., Geisen, M., Cros, L., Kleijne, A., Probert, I. & Ostergaard, J. B. (2003). A guide to extant coccolithophore taxonomy. Journal of Nannoplankton Research. S1: 1-132. gs References:

![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]() |
Umbellosphaera tenuis compiled by Jeremy R. Young, Paul R. Bown, Jacqueline A. Lees viewed: 16-8-2026
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?id=1452 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments