select * from moduleUsers where username='anyone'
This page provides data from the catalog of type descriptions. The catalog is sorted alphabetically. Use the current identification link to go back to the main database.
Linked specimens: London, UK; NHM (PM PF 49707) London, UK; NHM (PM P 49707)
Current identification:
Original Description
Size:
Extra details from original publication
G. (G.) hirsuta praehirsuta differs from G. (G.) margaritae in showing no typically developed ventral concavity, for in margaritae the test, in axial profile, normally appears concavo-convex. Even when this ventral concavity is absent in some specimens of margaritae, there is no significant inflation of the ventral chamber surfaces including the final chamber. The spire of G. (G.) margaritae is more tightly coiled than in G. (G.) hirsuta praehirsuta and the former taxon does not show the distinct flare of the spire as seen in the later parts of the test of praehirsuta.
"The distinction between hirsuta (sensu stricto) and praehirsuta seems to be best made in terms of the absence or presence of a distinct umbilical pit, whilst the distinction between margaritae and praehirsuta is best made in terms of the more-or-less sudden change to a more open coiling mode seen in the later parts of the test of specimens referable to G. (G.) hirsuta praehirsuta. Additionally, the distinction between margaritae and praehirsuta can be made in terms of the ventral concavity of the former taxon and the essentially plano-convex test of the latter taxon. Finally, the consistently tighter coiling at all stages of ontogeny in G. (G.) margaritae is expressed in the dorsal appearance of the last few chambers of the spire which are much longer tangentially than broad radially as compared to the corresponding chambers of G. (G.) hirsuta praehirsuta. Essentially, the evolution of G. (G.) hirsuta hirsuta from G. (G.) margaritae via G. (G.) hirsuta praehirsuta is accompanied by a gradual increasing laxity of the spire which is eventually shown in the development of a small but open umbilical depression in hirsuta hirsuta. The chambers, in dorsal aspect, become less closely appressed, less embracing and better separated one from the other in the development of the phylogenetically more advanced forms of the lineage. In axial profile, the test gradually becomes more tumid and there is the development of a convex ventral surface in G. (G.) hirsuta hirsuta as compared to the concavo-convex and plano-convex tests of the earlier forms of the lineage. There is little development in the relative strength of the carina but there is a gradual increase in the degree of both ventral and dorsal pustulation and an overall increase of average test size for a given stage of ontogeny."
Blow, W. H. (1969). Late middle Eocene to Recent planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy. In, Bronnimann, P. & Renz, H. H. (eds) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils, Geneva, 1967. E J Brill, Leiden 380-381. gs Blow, W. H. (1979). The Cainozoic Globigerinida: A study of the morphology, taxonomy, evolutionary relationships and stratigraphical distribution of some Globigerinida (mainly Globigerinacea). E. J. Brill, Leiden. 2: 1-1413. gsReferences:
Globorotalia (Globorotalia) hirsuta praehirsuta compiled by the pforams@mikrotax project team viewed: 23-1-2025
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/pforams/index.php?id=130982 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments (2)
I think it was published as a subsp.: Globorotalia (Globorotalia ) hirsuta subsp. praehirsuta Blow, 1969 (see above: Extra details from original publication)
yes, I just checked and it is described as a sub-species, so i have now corrected the page
Thanks Jeremy