This page provides data from the catalog of type descriptions. The catalog is sorted alphabetically. Use the current identification link to go back to the main database.
Linked specimens: London, UK; NHM (PM P 45599) London, UK; NHM (45600)
Current identification/main database link: Morozovella gracilis (Bolli 1957)
Original Description
Size:
Extra details from original publication
Globorotalia rex Martin is closely related to G. aequa Cushman and Renz, and may be a junior synonym of G. simulatilis (Schwager) [Discorbina simulatilis, 1882 ] although very little is known about Schwager's species. On the other hand, the form figured by Bolli (1957) appears to be more closely related to the G. velascoensis group, especially to G. velascoensis parva Rey. It differs from the latter, only in being smaller, having a rougher surface, a much smaller umbilicus, a less protruding ventral side and a weaker, less ornamented umbilical shoulder.
Careful examination of G. rex as described and figured by Martin (1943 p. 117-8, pl. 8, fig. 2a-c) from the Lodo formation of California, and by Mallory (1959, p. 257) from the same formation, showed that the form described by Bolli (1957) as G. rex Martin is different and should be considered separately.
A form with a much rougher surface than the holotype, sub-circular test, and more chambers in the last whorl (fig. 6a-d), may well be a transitional stage between G. velascoensis velascoensis and the present species. This substantiates the hypothesis that G. bollii evolved from G. velascoensis velascoensis in late Paleocene or early Eocene time, as suggested by their morphological features and stratigraphical ranges. Subbotina (1953 pp. 212-2 13, pl.18, fig. la-c) figured as G. marginodentata Subbotina, a form with a flat dorsal side, which may belong to G. bollii. Loeblich and Tappan (1957) described as G. rex Martin a form which appears to be different from the holotype of Martin (1943), the hypotype of Mallory (19S9) and the present form.
Editors' Notes
Bolli, H. M. (1957d). The genera Globigerina and Globorotalia in the Paleocene-Lower Eocene Lizard Springs Formation of Trinidad. In, Loeblich, A. R. , Jr., Tappan, H., Beckmann, J. P., Bolli, H. M., Montanaro Gallitelli, E. & Troelsen, J. C. (eds) Studies in Foraminifera. U.S. National Museum Bulletin . 215: 61-82. gs El-Naggar, Z. R. (1966). Stratigraphy and planktonic foraminifera of the Upper Cretaceous-Lower Tertiary succession in the Esna-Idfu region, Nile Valley, Egypt, U. A. R. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). supplement 2: 1-291. gs Mallory, V. S. (1959). Lower Tertiary biostratigraphy of the California Coast Ranges. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma. 1-416. gs Martin, L. T. (1943). Eocene foraminifera from the type Lodo Formation, Fresno County, California. Stanford University Publications, Geological Sciences. 3(3): 1-35. gs Subbotina, N. N. (1953). Foraminiferes fossiles d'URSS Globigerinidae, Globorotaliidae, Hantkeninidae. Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres. 2239: 1-144. gsReferences:
Globorotalia bollii compiled by the pforams@mikrotax project team viewed: 9-9-2024
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/pforams/index.php?id=131077 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments