Globigerinathekabarri Brönnimann, 1952:27 (partim), text-fig. 3a-c (holotype), 3g, h, paratypes [upper Eocene, Mount Moriah Fm., Harmony Hall Well 2, Trinidad] (not text- figs. 3d-f = G. kugleri).—Bolli, Loeblich and Tappan, 1957: pl. 7: figs. 12a-c [middle Eocene, Navet Fm., Trinidad].—Bolli, 1957:166, pl. 37: figs. 8, 9 [middle Eocene Porticulasphaeramexicana Zone, Navet Fm., Trinidad].—Mohan and Soodan, 1970: pl 1: fig. 6 [middle Eocene Orbulinoidesbeckmanni Zone, Kutch, India].— Postuma, 1971:164, figs. on p. 165 [Trinidad].—Stainforth and others, 1975: figs. 37.1, 3 (from Bolli, 1957), figs. 37.4-6 (from Bolli, 1972).—Blow, 1979:866, pl. 241: fig. 9 [upper Eocene Zone P15, Sample FCRM 1644, Lindi area, Tanzania].—Salaj, 1980: pl. 26: fig. 9 [middle Eocene Zone P13, Enfidaville, Tunisia]; pl. 27: figs. 7-9, 12 [?Zone P15, Dj. Fkirine, Tunisia].
Globigerinatheka (Globigerinatheka) indexbarri Brönnimann.—Jenkins, 1971:186, pl. 21: fig. 632 [upper Eocene, type Runangan, Port Elisabeth Section, New Zealand].
Globigerinathekamexicanabarri Brönnimann.—Bolli, 1972:128, text-figs. 18-20 (holotype refigured), text-figs. 21-23 (from Bolli and others, 1957), pl. 1: figs. 18-21 [middle Eocene Globigerinathekasubconglobata Zone (figs. 18-19) and Orbulinoidesbeckmanni Zone (fig. 21), Possagno Section, northern Italy]; pl. 2: figs. 8-20 [middle Eocene Orbulinoidesbeckmanni Zone, Navet Fm., Trinidad].—Toumarkine, 1975: pl. 4: fig. 5 [middle Eocene Globorotalialehneri to Truncorotaloidesrohri Zone, DSDP Site 305, Shatsky Rise, northwest Pacific Ocean].—Poore and Brabb, 1977: pl. 4: figs. 13-4, pl. 7: fig. 3 [middle Eocene Zones P13-P14, San Lorenzo Fm., California].—Toumarkine, 1978: pl. 4: fig. 8 [middle Eocene Globorotalialehneri to Truncorotaloidesrohri Zone, DSDP Site 360, South Atlantic Ocean]; pl. 4: fig. 9 [upper Eocene Globigerinathekasemiinvoluta Zone, DSDP Site 363, South Atlantic Ocean], pl. 4: fig. 11 [middle Eocene Hantkeninaaragonensis to Globorotalialehneri Zone, DSDP Site 363, South Atlantic Ocean].— Toumarkine, 1983: pl. 20: figs. 18-22, 28 [upper Eocene Zone P15, DSDP Site 363, South Atlantic Ocean]; figs. 23-27 (from Bolli, 1972); figs. 29a-c (from Bolli and others, 1957).—Nishi and Chaproniere, 1994: pl. 2: figs. 25-26 [upper Eocene Zones P15/16, DSDP Hole 841B, southwest Pacific Ocean].—Warraich and Nishi 2003: pl. 2: figs. 8a-b [middle Eocene Zone P12, Zinda Pir West Section, Indus Basin, Pakistan].
?Globigerinathekabarri Brönnimann.—Snyder and Waters, 1985: pl. 5: fig. 1 [DSDP Site 549A, Goban Spur, eastern North Atlantic Ocean].—Huber, 1991:440, pl. 7: fig. 16 [upper Eocene Zone AP12, ODP Hole 738B, Kerguelen Plateau, south Indian Ocean].
?Globigerinathekamexicanabarri Brönnimann.—Nishi and Chaproniere, 1994: pl. 2: figs. 10-12 [upper Eocene DSDP Hole 841B, south-west Pacific Ocean].
Globigerinathekamexicanamexicana (Cushman).— Toumarkine, 1978: pl. 4: fig. 6 [middle Eocene Orbulinoidesbeckmanni Zone, DSDP Site 363, South Atlantic Ocean]; pl. 4: fig. 7 [middle Eocene Truncorotaloidesrohri Zone, DSDP Site 363, South Atlantic Ocean]. [Not Cushman, 1925.] Globigerinathekaindextropicalis (Blow and Banner).—Bolli, 1972: pl. 3: figs. 14-15 [upper Eocene Globigerinathekasemiinvoluta Zone, Navet Fm., Trinidad]. [Not Blow and Banner, 1962.]
Globigerinathekatropicalis (Blow and Banner).—Stainforth and others, 1975, figs. 94.4-5 [from Bolli, 1972]. [Not Blow and Banner, 1962.]
Not Globigerinathekabarri Brönnimann.—Eckert, 1963: pl. 7: fig. 4a-c (= G. luterbacheri). —Samanta, 1970: pl. 2: figs. 20-21 (= G. mexicana).—Baumann, 1970: pl. 3: fig. 1 [middle Eocene Globigerapsismexicana Zone, Scalette Section, Umbria, Italy] (= G. euganea).—Toumarkine, 1971: pl. 3: figs., 1-4 [fig. 1, upper Eocene Globigerapsissemiinvoluta Zone; figs. 2-3, middle Eocene Truncorotaloidesrohri Zone, Halimba borehole, Bakony, Hungary] (= G. mexicana).—Pujol, 1983: pl. 8: fig. 12 [upper Eocene Zone P15-16, DSDP Hole 516F, Rio Grande Rise, South Atlantic Ocean] (= G. euganea).— Snyder and Waters, 1985: pl. 5: fig. 2 [DSDP Hole 549A, Goban Spur, eastern North Atlantic Ocean] (= G. luterbacheri).
Taxonomic discussion: In the original drawings of Globigerinathekabarri Bronnimann (1952) the specimen in text-figs. 3d-f does not have bullae, and is more consistent with G. kugleri. Bolli (1972) reported that G. barri is “almost identical” with G. mexicana except for the lack of bullae in the latter. For this reason, he considered barri as a subspecies of G. mexicana. However, as reported above, and in agreement with Blow (1979), G. barri differs from G. mexicana in having a shorter, slightly higher initial spire, sutures that are more depressed and a smaller flatter last chamber. The specimen identified by Samanta (1970, pl. 2, fig. 16) as G. index shows a coiling mode that is close to that of G. barri, to which it is here attributed, even though it is devoid of bullae. [Premoli Silva et al. 2006]
Distinguishing features: Parent taxon (Globigerinatheka): Medium to large, subspherical to spherical tests; multiple secondary apertures, frequently covered by bullae. This taxon: Test compact test, nearly globular. Characterized by numerous secondary subcircular apertures with bullae.
NB These concise distinguishing features statements are used in the tables of daughter-taxa to act as quick summaries of the differences between e.g. species of one genus. They are being edited as the site is developed and comments on them are especially welcome.
Description
Diagnostic characters: Globigerinathekabarri is characterized by its numerous secondary apertures with bullae. It differs from G. mexicana in having fewer chambers in the first whorl which are arranged in a slightly higher trochospire, more depressed sutures throughout the test, and a smaller flatter last chamber which occupies a maximum of one third of the entire test (instead of half of it, as in G. mexicana). Even though several features, like the secondary apertures, are masked by numerous bullae, G. barri differs from G. kugleri in having the test nearly globular instead of roughly subtriangular, a less lobate and more compact outline, subcircular apertures instead of rather wide low arches, and common bullae with subcircular accessory apertures. [Premoli Silva et al. 2006] Morphology: Subglobular to globular, early chambers in low trochospiral as in Globigerina, later chambers more or less streptospirally coiled, with the larger last chambers tending to envelop the previous whorls and the final chamber frequently enveloping and covering the umbilical area formed by the previous chambers. Sutures depressed, radial. Primary aperture in the early globigerinid stage interiomarginal, umbilical, in later stage single primary aperture may be replaced by multiple, arched, sutural apertures. In the enveloping, final chamber one or more secondary sutural apertures may or may not be covered by bullae of varying size. Each bulla possesses one or more small infralaminal accessory apertures. [Premoli Silva et al. 2006] Wall type: Spinose, cancellate; commonly covered by a thick calcite crust. [Premoli Silva et al. 2006]
Character matrix
test outline:
Circular
chamber arrangement:
Enveloping
edge view:
Equally biconvex
aperture:
Umbilical
sp chamber shape:
Globular
coiling axis:
Low
periphery:
N/A
aperture border:
N/A
umb chbr shape:
Globular
umbilicus:
Narrow
periph margin shape:
Broadly rounded
accessory apertures:
Sutural
spiral sutures:
Moderately depressed
umb depth:
Deep
wall texture:
Spinose
shell porosity:
Macroperforate: >2.5µm
umbilical or test sutures:
Moderately depressed
final-whorl chambers:
4-5
N.B. These characters are used for advanced search. N/A - not applicable
Biogeography and Palaeobiology
Geographic distributionCommon in low and middle latitudes. [Premoli Silva et al. 2006]
Aze et al. 2011 summary: Low to middle latitudes; based on Premoli Silva et al. (2006) Isotope paleobiologyNo data available. [Premoli Silva et al. 2006] Aze et al. 2011 ecogroup 1 - Open ocean mixed-layer tropical/subtropical, with symbionts; based on comparison with other species of the genus. Phylogenetic relationsSaito (1962) and Bolli (1972) suggested that G. barri may have evolved from G. subconglobata. However, Bolli (1972, p. 114) in the reconstruction of the globigerinathekid phylogenetic tree proposed mexicana as ancestral to barri, from which he suggested kugleri evolved; this relationship is rejected here. [Premoli Silva et al. 2006]
Most likely ancestor: Globigerinatheka subconglobata - at confidence level 3 (out of 5). Data source: Premoli Silva et al. 2006 f7.1.
Biostratigraphic distribution
Geological Range: Notes: G. barri is confined mainly to the middle Eocene, appearing in the mid-part of Zone E9 and extending up almost to the top of Zone E14. [Premoli Silva et al. 2006] Last occurrence (top): within E14 zone (35.89-37.99Ma, top in Priabonian stage). Data source: Premoli Silva et al. 2006 f7.1 First occurrence (base): in upper part of E9 zone (60% up, 43.5Ma, in Lutetian stage). Data source: Premoli Silva et al. 2006 f7.1
Plot of occurrence data:
Range-bar - range as quoted above, pink interval top occurs in, green interval base occurs in.
Triangles indicate an event for which a precise placement has been suggested.
Grey shading between taxa indicates intergrading species within an anagenetic lineage (data from
Lamyman et al. 2026).
Histogram - Neptune occurrence data from DSDP and ODP proceedings. Pale shading <50 samples in time bin. Interpret with caution & read these notes
Primary source for this page: Premoli Silva et al. 2006 - Eocene Atlas, chap. 7, p. 177
References:
Baumann, P. (1970). Mikropalaentologische und stratigraphische Untersuchungen der obereozaenen-oligozaenen Scaglia im zentralen Apennin (Italien). Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae. 63: 1133-1211. gs
Blow, W. H. & Banner, F. T. (1962). The mid-Tertiary (Upper Eocene to Aquitanian) Globigerinaceae. In, Eames, F. E., Banner, F. T., Blow, W. H. & Clarke, W. J. (eds) Fundamentals of mid-Tertiary Stratigraphical Correlation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 61-151. gs
Blow, W. H. (1979). The Cainozoic Globigerinida: A study of the morphology, taxonomy, evolutionary relationships and stratigraphical distribution of some Globigerinida (mainly Globigerinacea). E. J. Brill, Leiden. 2: 1-1413. gs
Bolli, H. M. (1957a). Planktonic foraminifera from the Eocene Navet and San Fernando formations of Trinidad. In, Loeblich, A. R. , Jr., Tappan, H., Beckmann, J. P., Bolli, H. M., Montanaro Gallitelli, E. & Troelsen, J. C. (eds) Studies in Foraminifera. U.S. National Museum Bulletin . 215: 155-172. gs
Bolli, H. M. (1972b). The genus Globigerinatheka Bronnimann. Journal of Foraminiferal Research. 2(3): 109-136. gsO
Bolli, H. M., Loeblich, A. R. & Tappan, H. (1957). Planktonic foraminiferal families Hantkeninidae, Orbulinidae, Globorotaliidae and Globotruncanidae. In, Loeblich, A. R. , Jr., Tappan, H., Beckmann, J. P., Bolli, H. M., Montanaro Gallitelli, E. & Troelsen, J. C. (eds) Studies in Foraminifera. U.S. National Museum Bulletin . 215: 3-50. gs
Brönnimann, P. (1952a). Globigerinoita and Globigerinatheka, new genera from the Tertiary of Trinidad, B.W.I. Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research. 3(1): 25-28. gs
Cushman, J. A. (1925d). New foraminifera from the Upper Eocene of Mexico. Contributions from the Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research. 1(1): 4-9. gs
Eckert, H. R. (1963). Die obereeozaen Globigerinen-Schiefer (Stadund Schimbergerschiefer) zwischen Pilatus und Schrattenfluh. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae. 56: 1001-1072. gsO
Finlay, H. J. (1939b). New Zealand foraminifera: Key species in stratigraphy - no. 2. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 69(1): 89-128. gs
Huber, B. T. (1991c). Paleogene and Early Neogene Planktonic Foraminifer Biostratigraphy of Sites 738 and 744, Kerguelen Plateau (Southern Indian Ocean). Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results. 119: 427-449. gs
Jenkins, D. G. (1971). New Zealand Cenozoic Planktonic Foraminifera. New Zealand Geological Survey, Paleontological Bulletin. 42: 1-278. gs
Loeblich, A. R. & Tappan, H. (1957b). Planktonic foraminifera of Paleocene and early Eocene Age from the Gulf and Atlantic coastal plains. In, Loeblich, A. R. , Jr., Tappan, H., Beckmann, J. P., Bolli, H. M., Montanaro Gallitelli, E. & Troelsen, J. C. (eds) Studies in Foraminifera. U.S. National Museum Bulletin . 215: 173-198. gs
Mohan, M. & Soodan, K. S. (1970). Middle Eocene planktonic foraminiferal zonation of Kutch, India. Micropaleontology. 16: 37-46. gs
Nishi, H. & Chaproniere, G. C. H. (1994). Eocene-Oligocene subtropical planktonic foraminifers at Site 841,. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results. 135: 245-266. gs
Poore, R. Z. & Brabb, E. E. (1977). Eocene and Oligocene planktonic foraminifera from the Upper Butano sandstone and type San Lorenzo formation, Santa Cruz Mountains, California. Journal of Foraminiferal Research. 7(4): 249-272. gs
Postuma, J. A. (1971). Manual of planktonic foraminifera. Elsevier for Shell Group, The Hague. 1-406. gs
Premoli Silva, I., Wade, B. S. & Pearson, P. N. (2006). Taxonomy, biostratigraphy, and phylogeny of Globigerinatheka and Orbulinoides. In, Pearson, P. N., Olsson, R. K., Hemleben, C., Huber, B. T. & Berggren, W. A. (eds) Atlas of Eocene Planktonic Foraminifera. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication . 41(Chap 7): 169-212. gsO
Pujol, C. (1983). Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the South-Western Atlantic (Rio Grande Rise): Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 72. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 72: 623-673. gs
Saito, T. (1962a). Eocene planktonic foraminifera from Hahajima (Hillsborough Island). Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan. 45: 209-225. gs
Salaj, J. (1980). Microbiostratigraphie du Crétacé et du Paléogène de la Tunisie septentrionale et orientale (Hypostratotypes Tunisiens). Geologicky Ustav Dionyza Stura, Bratislava. 1-238. gs
Snyder, S. W. & Waters, V. J. (1985). Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Goban Spur Region, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 80. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 80: 439-472. gs
Stainforth, R. M., Lamb, J. L., Luterbacher, H., Beard, J. H. & Jeffords, R. M. (1975). Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal zonation and characteristics of index forms. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Articles. 62: 1-425. gsO
Toumarkine, M. (1971). Etude des Foraminifères planctoniques de deux sondages (H-S49 et PGYT-31) dans l’ Eocène de la Montagne du Bakony (Transdanubie, Hongrie). Annales Instituti Geologici Publici Hungarici. 54: 283-299. gs
Toumarkine, M. (1975). Middle and Late Eocene planktonic foraminifera from the northwestern Pacific Ocean: Leg 32 of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 32: 735-751. gs
Toumarkine, M. (1978). Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Paleogene of Sites 360 to 364 and the Neogene of Sites 362A, 363 and 364 Leg 40,. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 40: 679-721. gs
Toumarkine, M. (1983). Les Foraminifères planctoniques de l’Eocène moyen et supérieur des régions tropicales à temperées chaudes. In, p1-219 (ed.) . PhD thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6 1-219. gs
Wade, B. S., Aljahdali, M. H., Mufrreh, Y. A., Memesh, A. M., AlSoubhi, S. A. & Zalmout, I. S. (2021). Upper Eocene planktonic foraminifera from northern Saudi Arabia: implications for stratigraphic ranges. Journal of Micropalaeontology. 40: 145-161. gsO
Warraich, M. Y. & Nishi, H. (2003). Eocene planktic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Sulaiman range, Indus Basin, Pakistan. Journal of Foraminiferal Research. 33: 219-236. gs
Globigerinatheka barri compiled by the pforams@mikrotax project teamviewed: 13-10-2026