Daughter taxa (time control age-window is: 0-800Ma) | Granddaughter taxa | |||
extant species | ||||
Globigerinoides tenellus Like G. rubescens but with a small, supplementary aperture. | ||||
Globigerinoides elongatus Like Gs. ruber but final chamber is asymmetrically flattened (compressed) | ||||
Globigerinoides conglobatus Tightly coiled test with flattened chambers and very small umbilicus | ||||
Globigerinoides ruber 3 subspherical chambers in final whorl; primary and supplementary apertures, symmetrically placed above a suture. | ||||
Early Pleistocene species | ||||
Globigerinoides rublobatus Like G. conglobatus but 3 chambers in final whorl, smaller forms show pink pigmentation, aperture located above the final suture | ||||
altiaperturus-obliquus-conglobatus lineage | ||||
Globigerinoides obliquus Obliquely compressed final chamber. | ||||
Globigerinoides extremus Strongly obliquely compressed & flattened final chamber. | ||||
Globigerinoides altiaperturus Large, arched primary aperture and almost equally large supplementary aperture opposite it. | ||||
Globigerinoides eoconglobatus Like G. obliquus, but final chamber less laterally compressed. | ||||
Globigerinoides joli Like G. neoparawoodi but with more lobate outline and a thick rim bordering the aperture. | ||||
Globigerinoides neoparawoodi Subovate to subtriangular, moderately lobulate, 3½-4 globular chambers in final whorls; umbilicus open & wide; Primary aperture high circular arch. One small supplementary sutural aperture on the spiral side (opposite the primary aperture). | ||||
bolli->kennetti lineage | ||||
Globigerinoides kennetti Like Gs. bolli but only 3 to 3½ chambers in final whorl (vs. 4), less-embracing chambers, and more subquadrate outline | ||||
Globigerinoides bollii Small, compact, aperture almost circular. Supplementary sutural aperture on spiral side | ||||
Globigerinoides italicus Primary aperture, an inverse drop-like and elongated arch, higher than it is wider | ||||
subquadratus-mitra lineage | ||||
Globigerinoides mitra Large test with very high spire, and large, asymmetric primary aperture | ||||
Globigerinoides seigliei Like G. ruber but somewhat aberrant primary aperture and large supplementary apertures | ||||
Globigerinoides subquadratus Like G. ruber but subquadrate. Prominent supplementary apertures | ||||
Globigerinoides diminutus Like G. subquadratus, but very small, compact test. Apertures almost circular, symmetrically above sutures. | ||||
others | ||||
Globigerinoides bulloideus Like G. bulloides but with supplementary apertures on the spiral side | ||||
Globigerinoides sp. Specimens which cannot be assigned to established species |
The genus Globigerinoides was used by Kennett & Srinivasan (1983) and many other workers for all Neogene Globigerina-type species with supplementary apertures, but it was long suspected that this was a polyphyletic group. Spezzaferri et al. (2015) conclusively proved this polyphyly using both stratophenetic and molecular genetic data and so divided the species into two groups - Trilobatus and Globigerinoides, as used here. They have separate origins and different wall structures. [my summary - JRY 2018] Cushman (1927) erected this genus and described it as similar to Globigerina but possessing numerous and large supplementary apertures on the spiral side of the last whorl only. Bolli (1957) informally included in the genus those species with supplementary apertures on the spiral side also in chambers from the inner whorls. Blow (1979) officially emended the description of Cushman (1927) and excluded from the genus all Paleocene species such as Globoconusa daubjergensis Brönnimann, all Eocene species with the exception of “Globigerinoides” higginsi Bolli [(now Guembelitrioides nuttalli (Hamilton)], and all Oligocene species. He considered as “Globigerinoides” only Neogene species with several spiral supplementary apertures in chambers prior to the last with the exception of the phylogenetically primitive “Globigerinoides” quadrilobatus primordius Blow and Banner, which possesses only one. Blow and Banner (1962) suggested that the first representative of the genus (“Globigerinoides” primordius) originated from Globigerina praebulloides occlusa by developing supplementary apertures on the spiral side. “Globigerinoides” primordius is now attributed to the genus Trilobatus (Spezzaferri and others, 2015) and the suggested phylogenetic link is no longer supported. [Spezzaferri et al. 2018] “Globigerinoides” has been for a long time considered as polyphyletic. However, the re-investigation of the fossil record coupled with genetic studies has now solved the problem of the polyphyletism of the genus, which can now be considered as monophyletic (Spezzaferri and others, 2015). The bullate forms described as Globigerinanus Ouda (1978) and interpreted as evolving from the genus Globigerinoides in the Burdigalian resemble well known species of Globigerinoides (e.g., Globigerinoides ruber) displaying a bulla-like gametogenetic last chamber, smaller or larger than the previous one and therefore, the genus Globigerinanus is not retained here. [Spezzaferri et al. 2018]
Catalog entries: Globigerinoides, Globigerinanus, Globicuniculus, Alloglobigerinoides
Distinguishing features:
Parent taxon (Globigerinidae): Wall spinose, usually with 3½-6 globular chambers in final whorl, trochospiral or planispiral
This taxon: Supplementary apertures, with ruber/sacculifer-type spinose wall texture
Morphology:
Wall type:
Geographic distribution
Phylogenetic relations
Most likely ancestor: Globoturborotalita - at confidence level 4 (out of 5). Data source: .
See also: Trilobatus - sacculifer and several other species are now placed in this genus.;
Geological Range:
Notes: The genus first appears at the Oligocene-Miocene transition, and in particular at the base of Subzone M1a and is still present in the modern oceans. [Spezzaferri et al. 2015]
Last occurrence (top): Extant. Data source: Total of ranges of the species in this database
First occurrence (base): within M1a subzone (22.44-22.96Ma, base in Aquitanian stage). Data source: Total of ranges of species in this database
Plot of occurrence data:
Primary source for this page: Spezzaferri et al. 2018 - Olig Atlas chap.9 p.272
Blow, W. H. & Banner, F. T. (1962). The mid-Tertiary (Upper Eocene to Aquitanian) Globigerinaceae. In, Eames, F. E., Banner, F. T., Blow, W. H. & Clarke, W. J. (eds) Fundamentals of mid-Tertiary Stratigraphical Correlation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 61-151. gs Blow, W. H. (1979). The Cainozoic Globigerinida: A study of the morphology, taxonomy, evolutionary relationships and stratigraphical distribution of some Globigerinida (mainly Globigerinacea). E. J. Brill, Leiden. 2: 1-1413. gs Bolli, H. M. (1957b). Planktonic foraminifera from the Oligocene-Miocene Cipero and Lengua formations of Trinidad, B.W.I. In, Loeblich, A. R. , Jr., Tappan, H., Beckmann, J. P., Bolli, H. M., Montanaro Gallitelli & E. Troelsen, J. C. (eds) Studies in Foraminifera. U.S. National Museum Bulletin . 215: 97-123. gs Cushman, J. A. (1927a). An outline of a re-classification of the Foraminifera. Contributions from the Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research. 3: 1-105. gs O Huang, T. (1986). Alloglobigerinoides, a new planktic foraminiferal genus. Petroleum Geology of Taiwan. 22: 93-102. gsReferences:
Globigerinoides compiled by the pforams@mikrotax project team viewed: 10-12-2024
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/pforams/index.php?id=104057 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |