Globigerina (Zeaglobigerina) apertura Cushman
Catalog entries: Globigerina apertura
Type images:Distinguishing features:
Parent taxon (Globoturborotalita): Trochospiral test with a single, large, open umbilical aperture. Cancellate wall. 4-4½ chambers in final whorl
This taxon: Like G. woodi but with very large aperture
Morphology:
Wall type:
Character matrix
test outline: | Lobate | chamber arrangement: | Trochospiral | edge view: | Concavo-convex | aperture: | Umbilical |
sp chamber shape: | Globular | coiling axis: | Low | periphery: | N/A | aperture border: | Thin lip |
umb chbr shape: | Globular | umbilicus: | Wide | periph margin shape: | Broadly rounded | accessory apertures: | None |
spiral sutures: | Weakly depressed | umb depth: | Deep | wall texture: | Cancellate | shell porosity: | Macroperforate: >2.5µm |
umbilical or test sutures: | Moderately depressed | final-whorl chambers: | 4.0-4.0 | N.B. These characters are used for advanced search. N/A - not applicable |
[SCOR WG138] G. apertura may be distinguished by its large semicircular aperture and cancellate surface. There is evidence of close phylogenetic relationships among G. apertura, G. decoraperta, and G. woodi. In the Middle Miocene, G. woodi with a very large aperture tends to intergrade with G. apertura, while in the Pliocene, G. apertura tends to intergrade with G. decoraperta. These species have similar surface ultrastructure and consistently have four uniformly increasing chambers in the final whorl. G. apertura developed from G. woodi by an expansion of the aperture. [Kennett & Srinivasan 1983]
Geographic distribution
Isotope paleobiology
Phylogenetic relations
The distinctive cancellate surface and apertural rim indicates that G. apertura is phyletically related to G. woodi and cannot be considered as a subspecies of G.bulloides as suggested by Blow (1969).
Most likely ancestor: Globoturborotalita woodi - at confidence level 3 (out of 5). Data source: Kennett & Srinivasan 1983, fig.8; Aze et al. 2011.
Geological Range:
Last occurrence (top): in lower part of PT1a subzone (20% up, 1.6Ma, in Calabrian stage). Data source: Wade et al. (2011), additional event; position within zone determined by linear interpolation from data in table 1 of Wade et al. (2011).
First occurrence (base): in lower part of M11 zone (42% up, 11.1Ma, in Tortonian stage). Data source: Wade et al. (2011), additional event; position within zone determined by linear interpolation from data in table 1 of Wade et al. (2011).
Plot of occurrence data:
Primary source for this page: Kennett & Srinivasan 1983, p.44
Aze, T. et al. (2011). A phylogeny of Cenozoic macroperforate planktonic foraminifera from fossil data. Biological Reviews. 86: 900-927. gs Blow, W. H. (1969). Late middle Eocene to Recent planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy. In, Bronnimann, P. & Renz, H. H. (eds) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils, Geneva, 1967. E J Brill, Leiden 380-381. gs Cushman, J. A. (1918b). Miocene foraminifera of the coastal plain of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin. 676: 39-73. gs Kennett, J. P. & Srinivasan, M. S. (1983). Neogene Planktonic Foraminifera. Hutchinson Ross Publishing Co., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. 1-265. gs Lam, A. & Leckie, R. M. (2020a). Late Neogene and Quaternary diversity and taxonomy of subtropical to temperate planktic foraminifera across the Kuroshio Current Extension, northwest Pacific Ocean. Micropaleontology. 66(3): 177-268. gs Norris, R. D. (1998). Planktonic foraminifer biostratigraphy: Eastern Equatorial Atlantic. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results. 159: 445-479. gs References:
![]() |
Globoturborotalita apertura compiled by the pforams@mikrotax project team viewed: 7-6-2023
Short stables page link: https://mikrotax.org/pforams/index.php?id=104148 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |