Globorotaliauncinatauncinata Bolli.—El-Naggar, 1966:240, pl. 18: fig. la-c, pl. 19: fig. 2a-c [samples S.34 and S.36, respectively, bothGloborotaliauncinata Zone, lower Esna Shale, Gebel Oweina, Egypt].
Acarininainconstansuncinata (Bolli). —Shutskaya, 1970a: 110, pl. 6: fig. la-c [holotype refigured], fig. 2a-c [middle part of Acarininainconstans Zone, Elburgan Fm., Kuban River, northern Caucasus], fig. 3a-c [lower part of Globigerinatrivialis -Globoconusadaubjergensis -Globorotaliacompressa Zone, northern Osetiya, Urukh River, northern Caucasus]; 1970b: 118-120, pl. 19: figs. 7a-c, lOa-c [Acarininainconstans Zone, Elburgan Fm., Kuban River, Cherkessk region, northern Caucasus],
Globorotalia (Acarinina) praecursoriapraecursoria ( Morozova).—Blow, 1979:944-947, pl. 76: figs. 4, 8, 9, pl. 81: fig. 3 [Zone P2, DSDP Hole 47.2/10/5: 70-72 cm], pl. 77: figs. 2-5 [Zone P2, DSDP Hole 20C/6/4: 72-74 cm; Brazil Basin, South Atlantic Ocean], pl. 82: figs. 1-3 [Zone P2, recollection of Globorotaliauncinata type locality, Trinidad], pl. 84:fig.2, pl. 85: fig. 9 [Zone P3, DSDP Hole 47.2/10/2: 80-82 cm; Shatsky Rise, northwestern Pacific Ocean], [Not Morozova, 1961.]
Morozovellauncinata (Bolli).—Snyder and Waters, 1985:448,449, pl. 10: figs. 1, 2 [Globorotaliauncinata Zone, DSDP Site 550/37/5: 59-61 cm; Porcupine Abyssal Plain, northeastern Atlantic Ocean], [Olsson et al. 1999]
Taxonomic discussion: Blow (1979) argued the case for including uncinata Bolli, 1957a, as a junior synonym of praecursoria Morozova, 1957. Our examination of the holotypes of both of these forms leads us to reject this interpretation. Rather, we interpret praecursoria as an advanced, atypically large end-member of inconstans that is characterized by rounded chambers and an axial periphery, and we reserve for uncinata those forms exhibiting the typical anguloconical (but noncarinate) test with distinctly incised and recurved spiral inter-cameral sutures. Acarininaindolensis Morozova (1959) is a small form of P. uncinata with five chambers in the final whorl but, nevertheless, exhibits the characteristic morphology of this species. [Olsson et al. 1999]
Distinguishing features: Parent taxon (Praemurica): Test very low trochospiral, usually 5-6, globular to oval chambers in last whorl, periphery lobulate; Wall non-spinose, weakly cancellate; This taxon: Plano-convex to moderately high spired, moderately lobulate test, 5-8 chambers in final whorl; sutures on spiral side incised and strongly recurved; axial periphery subangular, with rugose muricae; umbilicus typically narrow and deep
NB These concise distinguishing features statements are used in the tables of daughter-taxa to act as quick summaries of the differences between e.g. species of one genus. They are being edited as the site is developed and comments on them are especially welcome.
Description
Diagnostic characters: Non-spinose, weakly cancellate, elongate-oval, plano-convex to moderately high spired, moderately lobulate test with 5-8 chambers in last whorl; chambers occasionally so loosely coiled as to form secondary spiral apertures between them; sutures on umbilical side radial, depressed, on spiral side incised and strongly recurved yielding typically trapezoidal shaped chambers; axial periphery subangular, noncarinate but with rugose muricae often situated along peripheral margin of early chambers of last whorl; umbilicus typically narrow, deep and bordered by weakly developed circumumbilical shoulder formed by raised periumbilical chamber extensions; aperture a narrow interiomarginal, umbilical-extraumbilical arch extending to the peripheral margin. [Olsson et al. 1999]
Character matrix
test outline:
Lobate
chamber arrangement:
Trochospiral
edge view:
Inequally biconvex
aperture:
Umbilical-extraumbilical
sp chamber shape:
Inflated
coiling axis:
Low
periphery:
N/A
aperture border:
N/A
umb chbr shape:
Inflated
umbilicus:
Narrow
periph margin shape:
Moderately rounded
accessory apertures:
None
spiral sutures:
Moderately depressed
umb depth:
Deep
wall texture:
Cancellate
shell porosity:
Finely Perforate: 1-2.5µm
umbilical or test sutures:
Moderately depressed
final-whorl chambers:
5-8
N.B. These characters are used for advanced search. N/A - not applicable
Biogeography and Palaeobiology
Geographic distributionThis taxon has been widely reported in the literature from predominantly low latitude (sub)tropical localities. Shutskaya (1970a, 1970b) recorded it from several localities in the northern Caucasus. This species does not appear to occur in high southern latitudes (Stott and Kennett, 1990; Huber, 1991b), and we have not found it in our examination of material from the southern part of the Indian Ocean (Figure 30). [Olsson et al. 1999]
Aze et al. 2011 summary: Low to middle latitudes; based on Olsson et al. (1999) Isotope paleobiologyPraemuricauncinata has more positive δ13C and more negative δ18O than Subbotina and Globanomalina and has an isotopic signature similar to that of Morozovella praeangulata (Shackleton et al., 1985; Berggren and Norris, 1997). There is a pronounced increase in δ13C with increased size in P. uncinata (Kelly et al., 1996; Norris, 1996). [Olsson et al. 1999] Aze et al. 2011 ecogroup 2 - Open ocean mixed-layer tropical/subtropical, without symbionts. Based on _13C lighter than species with symbionts; also with relatively light _18O. Sources cited by Aze et al. 2011 (appendix S3): Berggren & Norris (1997); Shackleton et al. (1985) Phylogenetic relationsThis species evolved from Praemuricainconstans at the base of Zone P2 by extension of the umbilically conical chambers into most of the final whorl, and by the formation of blunt pustules around the umbilicus and on the initial chambers of the final whorl. [Olsson et al. 1999]
Geological Range: Notes: Zone P2 to lower Zone P3. [Olsson et al. 1999]
The FAD of Praemurica uncinata marks the base of zone P2 / top of P1c (Wade et al. 2011) Last occurrence (top): in lower part of P3a subzone (40% up, 61.9Ma, in Danian stage). Data source: Olsson et al. 1999 First occurrence (base): at base of P2 zone (0% up, 62.6Ma, in Danian stage). Data source: zonal marker (Wade et al. 2011)
Plot of occurrence data:
Range-bar - range as quoted above, pink interval top occurs in, green interval base occurs in.
Triangles indicate an event for which a precise placement has been suggested
Histogram - Neptune occurrence data from DSDP and ODP proceedings. Pale shading <50 samples in time bin. Interpret with caution & read these notes
Primary source for this page: Olsson et al. 1999 - Atlas of Paleocene Planktonic Foraminifera, p. 76
References:
Berggren, W. A. (1965). Some Problems of Paleocene-Lower Eocene Planktonic Foraminiferal Correlations. Micropaleontology. 11: 278-300. gs
Blow, W. H. (1979). The Cainozoic Globigerinida: A study of the morphology, taxonomy, evolutionary relationships and stratigraphical distribution of some Globigerinida (mainly Globigerinacea). E. J. Brill, Leiden. 2: 1-1413. gs
Bolli, H. M. (1957d). The genera Globigerina and Globorotalia in the Paleocene-Lower Eocene Lizard Springs Formation of Trinidad. In, Loeblich, A. R. , Jr., Tappan, H., Beckmann, J. P., Bolli, H. M., Montanaro Gallitelli, E. & Troelsen, J. C. (eds) Studies in Foraminifera. U.S. National Museum Bulletin . 215: 61-82. gs
El-Naggar, Z. R. (1966). Stratigraphy and planktonic foraminifera of the Upper Cretaceous-Lower Tertiary succession in the Esna-Idfu region, Nile Valley, Egypt, U. A. R. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). supplement 2: 1-291. gs
Luterbacher, H. P. (1964). Studies in some Globorotalia from the Paleocene and Lower Eocene of the Central Apennines. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae. 57: 631-730. gsO
Morozova, V. G. (1959). Stratigraphy of the Danian-Montian deposits of the Crimea according to the foraminifera. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. 124(5): 1113-1115. gs
Olsson, R. K., Hemleben, C., Berggren, W. A. & Huber, B. T. (1999). Atlas of Paleocene Planktonic Foraminifera. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. (85): 1-252. gs
Postuma, J. A. (1971). Manual of planktonic foraminifera. Elsevier for Shell Group, The Hague. 1-406. gs
Pujol, C. (1983). Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the South-Western Atlantic (Rio Grande Rise): Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 72. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 72: 623-673. gs
Said, R. & Sabry, H. (1964). Planktonic foraminifera from the type locality of the Esna Shale in Egypt. Micropaleontology. 10(3): 375-395. gs
Shutskaya, E. K. (1970a). Morphologic groups and descriptions of species of Globigerina and Acarinina in the lower Paleogene of the Crimea, the Caucasus Foreland, and western Central Asia. Trudy Vsesoyuznego Neftyanogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Instituta (VNIGRI). 69: 79-113. gs
Shutskaya, E. K. (1970b). Stratigrafiya, foraminifery i paleogeografiya nizhnego paleogena Kryma, predkavkaz'ya i zapadnoi chadsti srednei azii [Stratigraphy, Foraminifera and Paleogeography of the Lower Paleogene in the Crimea, Precaucasus and the Western Part of Central Asia]. Trudy Vsesoyuznego Neftyanogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Instituta (VNIGRI). 70(1): 256-. gs
Snyder, S. W. & Waters, V. J. (1985). Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Goban Spur Region, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 80. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 80: 439-472. gs
Toumarkine, M. (1978). Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Paleogene of Sites 360 to 364 and the Neogene of Sites 362A, 363 and 364 Leg 40,. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 40: 679-721. gs
Wade, B. S., Pearson, P. N., Berggren, W. A. & Pälike, H. (2011). Review and revision of Cenozoic tropical planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and calibration to the geomagnetic polarity and astronomical time scale. Earth-Science Reviews. 104: 111-142. gs
Praemurica uncinata compiled by the pforams@mikrotax project teamviewed: 13-1-2026