In his discussion of this species, Blow (1979) emphasized the apertural lip, which he identified as a porticus. He believed that the porticus was a feature that was added as a later ontogenetic structure to the test. He based his belief on his study of the structure, which in a SEM (1979, pi. 238: fig. 6) he interpreted as an infilling of pore-pits. At that time little was known about the ontogeny and gametogenesis of planktonic foraminifera. It is quite clear now that the lip forms as an extension of the primary chamber wall and that the cancellate texture develops throughout ontogeny and is enhanced during gametogenesis. The cancellate texture does not develop on the apertural lip, which, apparently, led Blow to interpret it as a separate, late-stage structure. [Olsson et al. 1999]
Blow named cancellata as a subspecies of Subbotina triangularis (White); however, triangularis has a distinctly different wall texture (Plate 2: Figures 15, 16, Plate 26) than cancellata. The recognition of a coarsely cancellate Subbotina lineage separates cancellata from triangularis and elevates it to species level. [Olsson et al. 1999]
Considerable confusion exists on the correct identification of Globigerina fringa Subbotina, 1950. The species is mostly identified in the lower Danian in Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary sections and is regarded as one of the earliest Danian species. The small size of the original figures of the holotype and its morphologic similarity to Eoglobigerina eobulloides Morozova, 1959, suggested that these species are synonymous (see Toumarkine and Luterbacher, 1985). SEMs taken by FR of the holotypes of the two species, however, shows this not to be the case (Plate 8: Figures 10-12, Plate 9: Figures 7-9). The distinguishing characteristic of G. fringa is a coarsely cancellate wall texture, which is similar to that in Subbotina cancellata Blow (1979). Furthermore, the coarsely cancellate wall texture observed in G. fringa is an advanced development in the evolution of wall texture in the Danian and is not present in Zone Pa stratigraphic levels. In fact, G. fringa was described from the "Pecten Horizon," which is apparently an upper Danian horizon in the Elburgan Formation in the northwest Caucasus. [Olsson et al. 1999]
Coarsely cancellate Subbotina cancellata morphotypes (Plate 25: Figures 1-15) occur in Zone Pic at DSDP Site 356 in the Southern Atlantic Ocean. They appear to be quite similar to the SEM of the holotype of Globigerina fringa Subbotina, 1953, shown on Plate 9: Figures 7-9. These morphotypes are smaller than typical S. cancellata and have 4-4½ chambers in the ultimate whorl. Although Subbotina described this species as having 4 chambers in the ultimate whorl, she chose a 4½-chambered specimen as the holotype. Most of the specimens in a suite of adults from DSDP Site 356 are 4-chambered (Plate 25). Small immature specimens often have 4½ chambers in the ultimate whorl, and these specimens have an umbilical to a slightly extraumbilical aperture (Plate 25: Figures 4, 10). In the adult specimens, the inner whorl is composed of 4½ chambers. This ontogenetic progression proceeds from an Eoglobigerina morphotype to a Subbotina morphotype and suggests that S. cancellata may have evolved from E. eobulloides; however, the strong cancellate wall texture is a distinctive characteristic of Subbotina. In general test morphology the cancellata morphotypes at DSDP Site 356 are similar to Subbotina trivialis Subbotina, 1953, suggesting that cancellata evolved from this species by enhancement of the cancellate wall. [Olsson et al. 1999]
The development of a coarsely cancellate wall begins a lineage that extends through S. cancellata to Subbotina velascoensis (Cushman, 1925). Although it is tempting to apply the name fringa to the DSDP Site 356 cancellata morphotypes, we recommend that this not be done pending further study on the morphologic characteristics of this taxon and on the stratigraphy and phylogeny of the coarsely cancellate Subbotinas in Zone PI. [Olsson et al. 1999]
Thus, it is clear that identification of fringa and its taxonomy should be considered carefully when using literature data in interpretative studies. For example, Brinkhuis and Zachariasse (1988) included fringa (together with edita) in the monophyletic genus Parvularugoglobigerina Hofker, 1978, emended, which is characterized by having a microperforate, nonspinose wall texture. Similarly, specimens identified by Keller (1988) as fringa (and indeed, other forms as cf. edita, hemisphaerica, and taurica) from the basal Paleocene of El Kef (Tunisia) are microperforate, nonspinose forms referable to Parvularugoglobigerina. [Olsson et al. 1999]
Catalog entries: Subbotina triangularis cancellata, Globigerina fringa
Type images:Distinguishing features:
Parent taxon (Subbotina): Low trochospiral, tripartite test, with 3-4 rapidly inflating, globular chambers in final whorl.
Umbilicus nearly closed by tight coiling.
Wall cancellate with spines at nodes of the ridges, +/- spine collars.
This taxon: Test tightly coiled, compact, rounded, and slightly lobulate; 3½-4 chambers in final whorl. Aperture umbilical with broad, somewhat irregular lip. Wall coarsely cancellate on all chambers.
Character matrix
test outline: | Lobate | chamber arrangement: | Trochospiral | edge view: | Equally biconvex | aperture: | Umbilical |
sp chamber shape: | Globular | coiling axis: | Low | periphery: | N/A | aperture border: | Thick lip |
umb chbr shape: | Globular | umbilicus: | Narrow | periph margin shape: | Broadly rounded | accessory apertures: | None |
spiral sutures: | Moderately depressed | umb depth: | Shallow | wall texture: | Cancellate | shell porosity: | Finely Perforate: 1-2.5µm |
umbilical or test sutures: | Moderately depressed | final-whorl chambers: | 3.5-4 | N.B. These characters are used for advanced search. N/A - not applicable |
Geographic distribution
Aze et al. 2011 summary: Unknown, but found in North and South Atlantic; based on Olsson et al. (1999)
Isotope paleobiology
Aze et al. 2011 ecogroup 3 - Open ocean thermocline. Based on light _13C and relatively heavy _18O. Sources cited by Aze et al. 2011 (appendix S3): Coxall et al. (2000)
Phylogenetic relations
Most likely ancestor: Subbotina trivialis - at confidence level 0 (out of 5). Data source: Olsson et al. 1999 f5a.
Likely descendants: Subbotina patagonica;
plot with descendants
Geological Range:
Notes: Zone Pic to Zone P4, currently known range. [Olsson et al. 1999]
Last occurrence (top): within P4 zone (57.10-60.73Ma, top in Thanetian stage). Data source: Olsson et al. 1999
First occurrence (base): within P1c subzone (62.60-63.90Ma, base in Danian stage). Data source: Olsson et al. 1999
Plot of occurrence data:
Primary source for this page: Olsson et al. 1999 - Atlas of Paleocene Planktonic Foraminifera, p. 29
Blow, W. H. (1979). The Cainozoic Globigerinida: A study of the morphology, taxonomy, evolutionary relationships and stratigraphical distribution of some Globigerinida (mainly Globigerinacea). E. J. Brill, Leiden. 2: 1-1413. gs Olsson, R. K., Hemleben, C., Berggren, W. A. & Huber, B. T. (1999). Atlas of Paleocene Planktonic Foraminifera. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. (85): 1-252. gs Subbotina, N. N. (1953). Foraminiferes fossiles d'URSS Globigerinidae, Globorotaliidae, Hantkeninidae. Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres. 2239: 1-144. gsReferences:
Subbotina cancellata compiled by the pforams@mikrotax project team viewed: 9-9-2024
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/pforams/index.php?id=100280 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |