Distinguishing features: Parent taxon (Sphaeroidinellopsis): trochospiral test, globular chambers, and a heavy, smooth, shiny cortex This taxon: Like S. seminulina but more spherical and tightly coiled test and with longer primary aperture. (with supplementary apertures becomes S. dehiscens).
NB These concise distinguishing features statements are used in the tables of daughter-taxa to act as quick summaries of the differences between e.g. species of one genus. They are being edited as the site is developed and comments on them are especially welcome.
Description
Diagnostic characters: Large, low trochospiral, ovate to smoothly rounded periphery, sutures obscured by thick secondary cortex
Aperture: An elongate umbilical opening following the line of suture of final chamber bordered by crenulated lip which is an extension of secondary cortex [Aze 2011, based on Kennett & Srinivasan 1983]
Morphology: Test large, low trochospiral, early chambers barely visible, ovate to smoothly rounded in equatorial periphery; chambers 3 in the final whorl, inflated; sutures largely obscured by the secondary test thickening; surface covered by thick, secondary calcareous material (cortex), which restricts the pores and provides a smooth and glossy appearance to the test; aperture an elongate umbilical opening following the line of suture between the last and first chamber of the final whorl, bordered by a crenulated lip, which are extensions of the cortex. [Kennett & Srinivasan 1983] Wall type: Non-spinose; Cancellate with smooth cortex [Aze 2011]
Character matrix
test outline:
Ovate
chamber arrangement:
Trochospiral
edge view:
Equally biconvex
aperture:
Umbilical
sp chamber shape:
Petaloid
coiling axis:
Low
periphery:
N/A
aperture border:
N/A
umb chbr shape:
Petaloid
umbilicus:
Narrow
periph margin shape:
Broadly rounded
accessory apertures:
None
spiral sutures:
Flush
umb depth:
Shallow
wall texture:
Smooth
shell porosity:
Macroperforate: >2.5µm
umbilical or test sutures:
Flush
final-whorl chambers:
3-3
N.B. These characters are used for advanced search. N/A - not applicable
Biogeography and Palaeobiology
Geographic distributionTropical [Kennett & Srinivasan 1983] Low latitudes [Aze et al. 2011, based on Kennett & Srinivasan (1983)]
[SCOR WG138]
Isotope paleobiologyAze et al. 2011 ecogroup 3 - Open ocean thermocline. Based on light δ13C and relatively heavy δ18O. Sources cited by Aze et al. 2011 (appendix S3): Pearson & Shackleton (1995) Phylogenetic relationsSs. paenedehiscens is distinguished from its ancestor Ss. seminulina seminulina by its more spherical and tightly coiled test and in possessing a longer primary aperture. This species differs from Sphaeroidinella dehiscens by not having supplementary apertures on the spiral side. The morphological changes that take place in the evolution of Ss. seminulina seminulina to Ss. paenedehiscens include an increase in the size of the test in Ss. paenedehiscens, development of a more spherical test exhibiting less depressed sutures, and conspicuous increase of flange-like apertural lips , which in Ss. seminulina seminulina are restricted to early chambers in the whorl. Unlike Ss. seminulina s.l., populations of Ss. paenedehiscens do not contain any 4-chambered forms in the final whorl. [Kennett & Srinivasan 1983]
Geological Range: Last occurrence (top): within N20 zone (3.10-4.37Ma, top in Piacenzian stage). Data source: Kennett & Srinivasan 1983 First occurrence (base): within N17b zone (5.72-6.60Ma, base in Messinian stage). Data source: Kennett & Srinivasan 1983
Plot of occurrence data:
Range-bar - range as quoted above, pink interval top occurs in, green interval base occurs in.
Triangles indicate an event for which a precise placement has been suggested
Histogram - Neptune occurrence data from DSDP and ODP proceedings. Pale shading <50 samples in time bin. Interpret with caution & read these notes
Primary source for this page: Kennett & Srinivasan 1983, p.210
References:
Aze, T., et al. (2011). A phylogeny of Cenozoic macroperforate planktonic foraminifera from fossil data. Biological Reviews. 86: 900-927. gs
Blow, W. H. (1969). Late middle Eocene to Recent planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy. In, Bronnimann, P. & Renz, H. H. (eds) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils, Geneva, 1967. E J Brill, Leiden 380-381. gs
Kennett, J. P. & Srinivasan, M. S. (1983). Neogene Planktonic Foraminifera. Hutchinson Ross Publishing Co., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. 1-265. gs
Lam, A. & Leckie, R. M. (2020a). Late Neogene and Quaternary diversity and taxonomy of subtropical to temperate planktic foraminifera across the Kuroshio Current Extension, northwest Pacific Ocean. Micropaleontology. 66(3): 177-268. gs
Norris, R. D. (1998). Planktonic foraminifer biostratigraphy: Eastern Equatorial Atlantic. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results. 159: 445-479. gsO
Pearson, P. N. & Shackleton, N. J. (1995). Neogene multispecies planktonic foraminifer stable isotope record, Site 871, Limalok Guyot. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results. 144: 401-410. gs
Sphaeroidinellopsis paenedehiscens compiled by the pforams@mikrotax project teamviewed: 12-6-2026