This page provides data from the catalog of type descriptions. The catalog is sorted alphabetically. Use the current identification link to go back to the main database.
Linked specimens: USNM-26782
Current identification/main database link: Hantkenina australis Finlay 1939
Original Description
The species is best described by a comparison with H. alabamensis, the genotype, which it most nearly resembles. It has similarly compressed chambers but the sutural gutters are deeper and more marked. No examples have been seen with other than five chambers. The spine, as in alabamensis, is directly adjacent to the next suture (not as in mexicana and its allies quite distant from it); it is of about the same relative legth when unbroken (as long as or longer than the distance from its base to the umbilicus) but instead of being practically straight as in alabamensis, it usually has a decided backward curve. A notable difference is that the succeeding chamber begins at the base of the spine at the same level as the previous one and does not start some distance up the spine, as is usual in alabamensis. The aperture is similar to that figured by Cushman (1924, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 66, art. 30, p. 3) but is narrower and the basal wings are distinctly less spread, diverging at less than 90°, instead of considerably more.
Size:
Extra details from original publication
The type (which will be figured later) has been chosen from the Hampden section, locality 5179B (1¼ miles North of Kakaho Creek, upper blue clays, about 5 feet below the top) - an Upper Bortonian horizon. Five damaged but uniform specimens were found showing some perfect spines and a highly polished surface, minutely but distinctly perforate.
This species appears to be limited to the Upper Bortonian. Besides the two localities mentioned, it occurs at 3310 (Pahi marl, -with Zeauvigerina), 5319 (Mangaotoro S.E. Survey District, 1 mile 31 chains at 180° from trig U).
The Eocene species recorded from Mexico by Nuttall ( 1930, p. 272) have little similarity to the New Zealand form, with the possible exception of H. longispina, but this has a more open umbilicus, a lobulate periphery and a spine, though of similar length, not quite adjacent to the following suture.
Coxall, H. K. & Pearson, P. N. (2006). Taxonomy, biostratigraphy, and phylogeny of the Hantkeninidae (Clavigerinella, Hantkenina and Cribrohantkenina). In, Pearson, P. N., Olsson, R. K., Hemleben, C., Huber, B. T. & Berggren, W. A. (eds) Atlas of Eocene Planktonic Foraminifera. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication . 41(Chap 8): 213-256. gs O Finlay, H. J. (1939d). New Zealand Foraminifera: The Occurrence of Rzehakina, Hantkenina, Rotaliatina, and Zeauvigerina. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 68(4): 534-543. gs Nuttall, W. L. F. (1930). Eocene Foraminifera from Mexico. Journal of Paleontology. 4: 271-293. gsReferences:
Hantkenina australis compiled by the pforams@mikrotax project team viewed: 16-9-2024
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/pforams/index.php?id=131664 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments