pforams@mikrotax - forum
So, the idea here is that we can use the commenting tools to discuss anything about the site or planktonic foraminifera. If discussions get long we can split the page into different topics. If no-one says anything we will quietly remove the page.
At the very least we will read every comment posted here so feel free to use this for:
- Bug reports and complaints about the site
- Suggestions of things we might do with the site
- Discussing preparation methods, microscopy techniques, etc.
- Publicising meetings or vacancies (or should we put up a jobs area?)
- Comments on how you use the site
How to add comments
If you scroll down to the bottom of the page you will find a heading "Add Comment" and a link "open the form". Click the link and you get a form to fill in. The same layout is there on every taxon page. For a bit more advice you can see the guidelines.
first thing congrats for the excellent tool you guys made and developed keeping it open, up to date and easy to use. It is very nice aldo to maintain the comments. I had a suggestion that maybe you already had thinked about, but here it goes:
Would you ever considered to create a "click and compare" tool, so when someone is trying to determine a taxon this person could open many colons for each candidate with the lines showing a given feature like age, aperture or ornamentation. I think this coul help in identification. Just wondering here.
Thanks for the kind words, it is always good to hear from people who are using the system. A select and compare feature has been suggested before and I have thought about it, but I am not sure about the amount of work need vs results. I will think about it again though. I would, however, suggest you experiment with the advanced search page - it does not work exactly how you were suggesting but there is a lot you can do on that page - for example select all taxa from a time interval with a particular set of characters. Also, if you have the screen space, then opening a couple of windows can really help.
I will appreciate if someone can help me to identify. the sample is from Amundsen Sea. I guess might be that one, the spinose species, looks like Globigerina falconensis?
Thank you in advance,
This website is not very helpful, I am doing a science project and it doesn't even say where the Racemiguembelina frusticosa
Dear Bob the Builder
Thanks you for your interest in the website, and if you do have any serious suggestions we will be glad to fix it, if we can. However, the comments you and your friends Mr & Mrs Isotope, Sponge Bob Pete and Science Genius have left so far have not been especially informative so I have deleted them, whilst leaving your contribution as an example of the form.
New plotting tools for Neptune data - October 2018
We have now added new tools to allow plotting of Neptune occurrence frequency data either in latitude-age grid or on biogeographic maps. These are available from the tools menu. Also, a table of data appears below the biographic maps which provides full metadata for the samples the occurrence data comes from.
Upgrade - September 2018
We have now added a very large set of data on Oligocene planktonic foraminifera, from Wade et al. (2108) Atlas of Oligocene Planktonic Foraminifera. As a result we have also merged the Neogene and Paleogene modules. This makes the site much more nearly comprehensive. Any feedback is very welcome
Can I use images from this website for my dissertation? I'm not sure if that counts as a student report, but it will be properly cited.
Yes, certainly. It is fine to use images from the site in a this or dissertation. Remeer hough that when images have come from a publication, which is the case for most images on the site then you should cite the publication they are from as well as the website
This is for A.palmerae, that is incorrect. base in Lutetian stage and top in Ypresian stage is correct.
Last occurrence (top): within E7 zone (45.72-50.20Ma, top in Lutetian stage). Data source: Berggren et al. 2006, f12.1
First occurrence (base): within E7 zone (45.72-50.20Ma, base in Ypresian stage). Data source: Berggren et al. 2006, f12.1
I am not sure i follow you exactly but the zone E7 within which A. palmerae occurs spans the top Ypresian and base Lutetian, so it's top occurrence is in the Lutetian and its base occurrence in the Ypresian
Thank you very much for this excellent database. It is a valuable source and very useful tool. However, Postuma (1971) photo of G. concavata for Dicarinella concavata is replaced with "Marginotruncana" coronata. All the best
Good to hear you find the database useful and thank you for pointing out that mistake, and especially for taking the time to work out what had happened. I hope this was an isolated mistake arising during bulk processing of hundreds of images but if you spot any more please do let us know via the comments. I have replaced the images now with the correct ones.
thank you for brilliant database. This was small contribution.
I have just recently seen this excellent database. Is there anything similar for benthonic forams? I would be happy to collaborate with my info on Lower Jurassic forams.
Good that you like the site. The nearest thing for benthonics so far is the foraminfera.eu site, which is a very impressive effort but coming from a somewhat different direction. It would certainly be possible to put you monograph into the mikrotax format and maybe it would be a good way to start a benthic site of this type, certainly we are very willing to expand the scope of the project.
It is great to see the Chronos Database safe, in a new place and with the addition of most of the Neogene taxa.
We will use this valuable resource frequently to better understand and discuss amongst us the ID of the many planktonic specimens in our samples. It will help us a lot to enlarge our catalog.
Thanks Michael, much appreciated. There is a link to foraminifera.eu in the links menu already - and please feel free to ask if you want to use anything from this site.