radiolaria - rads_cenozoic - Cubotholus octoceras radiolaria - rads_cenozoic - Cubotholus octoceras

Cubotholus octoceras


Classification: rads_cenozoic -> Tholoniidae -> Tholoniidae inc sed -> Cubotholus -> Cubotholus octoceras
Sister taxa: C. octoceras, C. sp.

Taxonomy

Citation: Cubotholus octoceras Haeckel 1887
taxonomic rank: species
Basionym: Cubotholus octoceras
Synonyms:
1887 Cubotholus octoceras - Haeckel p. 681
1966 Cubotholus cf. octoceras - Benson p. 260-262; pl. 17, fig. 8
1972 Cubotholus sp. - Dumitrica pl. 7, fig. 3
1976 ?Cubotholus rhombicus - McMillen p. 104; pl. 3, fig. 19
1976 Cubotholus regularis - Renz p. 113; pl. 1, fig. 18
1983 Cubotholus regularis - Benson p. 502
1995 Amphitholus metallasson - van de Paverd p. 184-185; pl. 53, figs. 9-10, (12?)

From Suzuki Paleotax db:

1887 Cubotholus (Cubotholura) octoceras n. sp. Haeckel p. 681

Catalog entries: Cubotholus octoceras

Original description: All six cupolas in pairs of different sizes. Both principal domes larger than the lateral domes, and these larger than the sagittal domes. Pores subregular, circular, twice as broad as the bars; eight to ten in the semicircle of each cupola. From the surface arise (at the intersecting points of every three cupolas) eight strong conical radial spines, about as long as the shell-axis; they lie in two diagonal planes, and are the external free prolongations of eight inner beams (homologous with the eight wing-spines of Tetrapyle octacantha), which connect the lentelliptical medullary shell with the eight corners of the cuboidal central chamber.
Remarks on original description: There was no illustration of this species in Haeckel (1887)
Haeckel listed Cubotholus octoceras under the subgeneric name Cubotholura, but did not include the subgeneric name in the species name.[comment from RadWorld database]

Description


Published descriptions


Benson 1966 - Cubotholus octoceras

Internal structure similar to that of Amphitholus acanthometra. Test consists of the basic Amphitholus-like shell, which is larger than A. acanthometra, with the addition of four large, dome-shaped, latticed cupolas, each at the poles of the principal and sagittal axes of the test. The cupolas at the poles of the principal axis are larger than those at the poles of the sagittal axis; the latter are slightly larger than the lateral cupolas of the Amphitholus-like shell. Pores and surface of the test the same as in A. acanthometra. Fourteen primary beams generally recognizable but additional beams present as well. Numerous (5-50 or more) long, conical radial spines present, most of which are not continuous inward as beams; spines of variable length on the test (6-62 µm), but those continuous inward with the 14 primary beams are generally the longest. No specimens were observed with an outer lattice-mantle, but if more specimens were available for study it may be found to be present.

Measurements: based on 4 specimens from stations 27, 81, and 184: length of principal axis of complete test 141-185 µm, of transverse axis of complete test 98-181 µm.

Remarks: This species was tentatively identified as Cubotholus octoceras Haeckel because it is the only species of Cubotholus that Haeckel described as having radial spines. Only the eight diagonal spines are present, however. Because it is not illustrated, it cannot be positively identified with the Gulf species. Of Haeckel's illustrated tholonid species, only Tholoma metallasson Haeckel (1887, p. 672, Pl. 10, fig. 13) resembles the Gulf specimens. It differs from them in the absence of the inner trizonal shells and in the presence of only four cupolas which are covered by a relativelythick-walled, equal-pored outer shell conforming to the shape of the inner cortical shell. Study of the type material of this species may reveal that it has the same internal structure as Cubotholus because observation of this structure is difficult.

Distribution: This species occurs rarely at only four stations in the Gulf, namely, 27, 34, and 81 in the southern Gulf and at 184 in the northern Gulf. Cubotholus octoceras was reported by Haeckel from the western tropical Pacific at Challenger station 224.This species, as well as perhaps all tholonid species, appears to be confined to tropical seas because none of them have been reported from high latitudes. \ From: Benson, 1966, p. 260-262; pl. 17, fig. 8:Cubotholus cf. octoceras Haeckel?Cubotholus octoceras Haeckel, 1887, Challenger Rept., Zool., vol. 18, p. 681.


Biogeography and Palaeobiology

Biostratigraphic distribution

Geological Range:
Last occurrence (top): Extant. Data source: Lazarus et al. 2015 - "R age group"
First occurrence (base): within Quaternary Period (0.00-2.59Ma, base in Gelasian stage). Data source: Lazarus et al. 2015 - "R age group"

Plot of occurrence data:

References:

Benson, R. N. (1966). Recent Radiolaria from the Gulf of California. Thesis, Minnesota University. 1-577. gs

Benson, R. N. (1983). Quaternary radiolarians from the Mouth of the Gulf of California, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 65. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 65: 491-523. gs

Haeckel, E (1887). Report on the Radiolaria collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876. 18: 1-1803. gs O

McMillen, K. -J. (1976). Ecology, distribution, and preservation of polycystine Radiolaria in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea. Thesis, Rice University. 1-135. gs

Renz, G. W. (1976). The distribution and ecology of Radiolaria in the central Pacific: plankton and surface sediments. Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. 22: 1-267. gs

van de Paverd, P. J. (1995). Recent Polycystine Radiolaria from the Snellius-II Expedition. Thesis, Free University Amsterdam. 1-351. gs

Missing or ambiguous references: Dumitrica 1972;


logo

Cubotholus octoceras compiled by the radiolaria@mikrotax project team viewed: 9-9-2024

Taxon Search:
Advanced Search

Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/radiolaria/index.php?id=203746 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes



Add Comment

* Required information
Captcha Image
Powered by Commentics

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first!