1966 Lophophaena cf. capito - Benson p. 378-380; pl. 24, figs. 22-23; pl. 25, fig. 1
1971 Lophophaenoma witjazii - Petrushevskaya p. 118-120; fig. 62, III-VII
1974 Lophophaenoma sp. aff. L. witjazii - Renz p. 794; pl. 18, fig. 13
1976 Lophophaenoma sp. aff. L. witjazii - Renz p. 159; pl. 6, fig. 14
1981 Lophophaena cf. capito - Takahashi and Honjo p. 151; pl. 6, fig. 22
1983 Lophophaenoma sp. aff. L. witjazii - Benson p. 505
1991 Lophophaena cf. capito (part.) - Takahashi p. 96; pl. 25, figs. 6-7, not 8-9
1995 Lophophaena witjazii - van de Paverd p. 222; pl. 66, figs. 1-3, 5
From Suzuki Paleotax db:
1971 Lophophaenoma witjazii Petrushevskaya n. sp. Petrushevskaya p. 118, pl. 62, figs. 3-7
1974 Lophophaenoma sp. aff. L. witjazii Petrushevskaya Renz p. 794, pl. 18, fig. 13
1976 Lophophaenoma sp. aff. L. witjazii Petrushevskaya Renz p. 159-160, pl. 6, fig. 14
1982 Lophophaenoma witjazii Petrushevskaya Poluzzi p. 60, pl. 22, figs. 1-3
1996 Lophophaenoma witjazii Petrushevskaya Chen & Tan p. 215-216, pl. 30, fig. 7-10, pl. 51, fig. 8, 9
2003 Lophophaenoma witjazii Petrushevskaya Tan & Su p. 173-174, pl. 5, fig. 14; pl. 17, figs. 5, 6; pl. 21, fig. 12
Catalog entries: Lophophaenoma witjazii
Original description: Lophophaenoma with a downwardly narrowed I segment. The width of the II segment exceeds 1.2-1.3 times the width of the I segment. Downwards, the II segment is cylindrical. On the I segment the pores are rounded, whereas on the II segment they are irregularly shaped. The largest pores are in the area of the junction of the segments, whereas the smallest ones are located on the upper part of the 1 segment. Spine A, as well as the upwardly oriented apophyses p of the lateral spines, penetrate the lower walls of the I segment and then extend outside, forming laterally dispersing horns. Besides the mentioned horns, there are sometimes 1-2 similarly faceted secondary horns. There is no horn on the apex of the I segment. Spines D, Lr and Ll yield short lateral appendages. (In Russian. Translation via W.R. Riedel)
Remarks on original description: Circumtropical. Confined to warm surtace-waters.
Benson 1966 - Lophophaenoma witjazii Bulbous cephalis smooth except for 3-8 or more generally three-bladed, relatively long accessory spines or horns originating from its broadest part and extending nearly horizontally to vertically; cephalis separated from a broad, smooth, cylindrical thorax by a necked region. Pores of both joints similar, circular to subpolygonal or polygonal, equal but relatively small (10-15 on half the largest circumference of the cephalis), hexagonally arranged, in several specimens in vertical rows. Four collar pores present; cardinal pores of type B; vertical bar thinner than median bar.A short, thin, conical vertical spine originates from the collar ring in the neck region. Apical bar a thin dorsal cephalic rib without larger pores disposed on either side of it; the apical spine extending from this rib originates from the dorsal cephalic face and is generally thin and conical but three-bladed in a few tests. Dorsal and primary lateral bars extend as thin, cylindrical to three-bladed thoracic ribs which terminate in very short, indistinct spines just below the change in contour of the upper part of the thorax; in a few specimens these spines are longer and more distinct but not typical of those of Lithomelissa hystrix or L. thoracites. Measurements: based on 7 specimens from stations 27, 34, 60, and 71: length of cephalis 55-76 m, of thorax 49-74 µm; breadth of cephalis 42-74 µm, of thorax 80-97 µm; length of apical spine 12-49 µm, of vertical spine 6-9 µm, of accessory cephalic spines or horns 6-50 µm, of dorsal and primary lateral spines 2-12 µm. Remarks: The light-bulb shape of the cephalis, the accessory cephalic spines or horns, the distinct necked region, and the relatively smooth surface and small, equal pores of both joints serve to distinguish this species. Ehrenberg (1876, P1. 8, fig. 6) illustrates a species from the Eocene or Oligocene of Barbados, Lophophaena capito, that has a cephalis and partially developed thorax similar to those of the Gulf species. It differs from the latter in the presence of smaller pores separated by wider intervening bars. His illustration also shows a conical dorsal spine originating from the cephalis immediately below the collar stricture. The primary lateral and dorsal bars of the Gulf species extend as thoracic ribs which terminate subterminally on the thorax as short, inconspicuous spines; therefore, this species has affinity for, if it does not actually belong in,Lithomelissa Ehrenberg. The genus Lophophaena Ebrenberg is similar to Lithomelissa except that radial apophyses are absent. Because the dorsal and primary lateral spines originating from the thoracic ribs are inconspicuous, the Gulf species is placed in Lophophaena with the understanding that the two genera in question are closely related if not congeneric. The Gulf species is also similar to Lophophaena? galeata Ehrenberg (1876, P1. 8, fig. 12) which lacks the dorsal spine. Whether or not this species is conspecific with L. capito cannot be determined without reference to type material. The Gulf species is tentatively identified with the latter because of the common presence of a dorsal, subterminal spine, although in Ehrenberg's illustration this does not extend from a thoracic rib.L. capito is shown with only one cephalic horn, whereas the Gulf specimens have several; a few, however, have weakly developed accessory horns or they are absent. The important similarity between the two species is the shape of the cephalis. Distribution: This species is rare in the Gulf but occurs as far north as station 184.It is absent north of this station as well as at stations 90, 95, and 130.Its slightly greater frequency and general occurrence in the southern Gulf and its absence in marginal areas indicates its preference for oceanic waters over those of the Gulf. \ From: Benson, 1966, p. 378-380; pl. 24, figs. 22-23; pl. 25, fig. 1:Lophophaenacf. capito Ehrenberg?Lophophaena capito Ehrenberg, 1874, Akad. Berlin, Monatsb. (1873), p. 242; 1876, Akad. Berlin, Abhandl. (1875), Pl. 8, fig. 6.
Published descriptions
Geological Range:
Last occurrence (top): Extant. Data source: Lazarus et al. 2015 - "R age group"
First occurrence (base): within Quaternary Period (0.00-2.59Ma, base in Gelasian stage). Data source: Lazarus et al. 2015 - "R age group"
Plot of occurrence data:
Benson, R. N. (1966). Recent Radiolaria from the Gulf of California. Thesis, Minnesota University. 1-577. gs Benson, R. N. (1983). Quaternary radiolarians from the Mouth of the Gulf of California, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 65. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 65: 491-523. gs Renz, G. W. (1974). Radiolaria from Leg 27 of the DSDP. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 27: 769-841. gs O Renz, G. W. (1976). The distribution and ecology of Radiolaria in the central Pacific: plankton and surface sediments. Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. 22: 1-267. gs Takahashi, K. & Honjo, S. (1981). Vertical flux of Radiolaria: A taxon-quantitative sediment trap study from the western tropical Atlantic. Micropaleontology. 27(2): 140-190. gs Takahashi, K. (1991). Radiolaria: Flux, ecology, and Taxonomy in the Pacific and Atlantic. Ocean Biocoenosis Series. 3: 1-301. gs van de Paverd, P. J. (1995). Recent Polycystine Radiolaria from the Snellius-II Expedition. Thesis, Free University Amsterdam. 1-351. gs Missing or ambiguous references: Petrushevskaya 1971; References:
Lophophaena witjazii compiled by the radiolaria@mikrotax project team viewed: 11-9-2024
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/radiolaria/index.php?id=204618 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |