Taxonomy:
Moestrup (1979) and Pienaar & Norris (1979) provide descriptions from electron microscopy, which agree very closely
Original description: Cellulae 6-8 µ long, 3-5 µ lat., duo flagella inaequa heterodynamica, atque haptonema breve rigidumque ab apice enascentia habentes; flagella 20-30 et 10-12 µ' long.; haptonema 6-8 µ long.; duae plastides clare flavae; nucleus central is; unum vel duo corpora magna posterior a leucosinus coniecta; oleum factum; stigma nullum; cellula non-metabolica, campanulata, autem cingulo profundo per 213 longitudinem cellulae ab apice extendente praedita; spinae longae tenuesque 10-20 µ long. solum in parte cellulae posteriore infra cingulum repertae; modus reproductionis non observatus; cellulae e loco Bay of Chaleurs, Quebec, Canada dicto lectae. Icon num. una ut holotypa Anglica designata.
Cells 6-8 µ long, 3-5 µ wide with two unequal, heterodynamic flagella and short, rigid haptonema arising apically; flagella 20-30 and 10-12 µ long, haptonema 6-8 po long; plastids two, bright yellow; central nucleus; one or two large posterior bodies thought to be leucosin; oil produced; eyespot absent; cell not metabolic but bell shaped with deep girdle 2/3 of cell length from apex; long fine spines, 10-20 µ long, present only on posterior portion of cell below the girdle; mode of reproduction not observed; collected from the Bay of Chaleurs, Quebec, Canada. Figure 1 is designated as the English holotype.
Farinacci & Howe catalog pages: Chrysocampanula spinifera
Morphology:
Scale types:
Pienaar & Norris 1979 suggest that the spines are formed coiled inside the cell and straighten when released
| Lith size: 0->0µm; |
Geological Range:
Last occurrence (top): Extant. Data source:
First occurrence (base): within No known fossil record modern (0.00-0.00Ma, base in "Holocene" stage). Data source:
Plot of occurrence data:
Edvardsen, B., Eikrem, W., Throndsen, J., Sáez, A. G., Probert, I. & Medlin, L. K. (2011). Ribosomal DNA phylogenies and a morphological revision provide the basis for a revised taxonomy of the Prymnesiales (Haptophyta). European Journal of Phycology. 46(3): 202-228. gs Fournier, R. O. (1971). Chrysocampanula spinifera gen. et sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae), a new marine haptophyte from the Bay of Chaleurs, Quebec. Phycologia. 10: 89-92. gs Moestrup, Ø. (1979). Identification by electron microscopy of marine nanoplankton from New Zealand, including the description of four new species. New Zealand. Journal of Botany. 17: 61-95. gs Pienaar, R. N. & Norris, R. E. (1979). The ultrastructure of the flagellate Chrysochromulina spinifera (Fournier) comb. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) with special reference to scale production. Phycologia. 18: 99-108. gs Sáez, A. G., Probert, I., Young, J. R., Edvardsen, B., Wenche, E. & Medlin, L. K. (2004). A review of the phylogeny of the Haptophyta. In, Thierstein, H. R. & Young, J. R. (eds) Coccolithophores - from molecular processes to global impact. Springer, Berlin 251-270. gs References:

![]()
![]()
![]() |
Chrysocampanula spinifera compiled by Jeremy R. Young, Paul R. Bown, Jacqueline A. Lees viewed: 13-11-2025
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?id=20076 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments