Sub-taxa & variants (time control age-window is: 0-800Ma)![]() | ||||
| Discoaster carneyi A species of the D. musicus group having slender, tapered rays with simple bifurcations | ||||
Distinguishing features:
Parent taxon (D. musicus group):
This taxon: Similar to D. exilis , but with wide central area and large distal boss, prominent sutural ridges extending between the rays.
| LITHS: nannolith-radiate, star-shaped, CA: process, CROSS-POLARS: 1ou, V-prominent, |
| Lith size: 9->15µm; Segments: 6->6; Data source notes: size from ODs |
Geological Range:
Notes: Confined to NN5 in the Mediterranean (Theodoridis 1984) but ranges into NN6 in the East Pacific (Bukry 1981), distribution probably patchy
Last occurrence (top): within NN6 zone (11.90-13.53Ma, top in Serravallian stage). Data source: Young 1998
First occurrence (base): within NN5 zone (13.53-14.91Ma, base in Langhian stage). Data source: Young 1998
Plot of occurrence data:
Bukry, D. (1981b). Pacific coast coccolith stratigraphy between Point Conception and Cabo Orientes, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 63. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 63: 445-471. gs de Kaenel, E. & Villa, G. (1996). Oligocene-Miocene calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy and paleoeecology from the Iberian Abyssal Plain. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results. 149: 79-145. gs O de Kaenel, E., Bergen, J. A., Browning, E., Blair, S. A. & Boesiger, T. M. (2017). Uppermost Oligocene to Middle Miocene Discoaster and Catinaster taxonomy and stratigraphy in the circum North Atlantic Basin: Gulf of Mexico and ODP Leg 154. Journal of Nannoplankton Research. 37(2-3): 215-244. gs O Stradner, H. (1959). First report on the discoasters of the Tertiary of Austria and their stratigraphic use. In, Proceedings of the Fifth World Petroleum Congress. 1: 1081-1095. gs Stradner, H., Aubry, M. -P. & Bonnemaison, M. (2010). Calcareous nannofossil type specimens in the collection of the Geological Survey of Austria: A taxonomic and stratigraphic update. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt. 150(1-2): 9-84. gs Theodoridis, S. (1984). Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Miocene and revision of the helicoliths and discoasters. Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletin. 32: 1-271. gs O Varol, O. & Bowman, A. R. (2024). The new Middle Miocene genus Olladiscoaster, and related and associated discoasters. Grzybowski Foundation Special Publication. 28: 1-102. gs Young, J. R. (1998). Neogene. In, Bown, P. R. (ed.) Calcareous Nannofossil Biostratigraphy. British Micropalaeontological Society Publication Series . 225-265. gs References:

![]()
![]()
![]()
![]() |
Discoaster musicus compiled by Jeremy R. Young, Paul R. Bown, Jacqueline A. Lees viewed: 13-10-2026
Short stable page link: https://mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?id=486 Go to Archive.is to create a permanent copy of this page - citation notes |
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.
Comments (3)
this raises plenty of issues
1. Commenting on 'missing taxa'. This is potentially a really valuable funtion of Nannotax, i.e. to get us discussing the less universally understood species concepts. I think it is best done at the place where the taxon is missing from - (so I have copied the comment to the D. musicus page).
2. Posting images - as you found out drag & drop works from external websites, which makes for a great way to rapidly discuss taxa. For a more permanent upload, or for image which are not on an external website use Add Image to put the image in a gallery then drag and drop from there. I've reposted theimage to the Disocaster gallery. [NB Image upload by users is not possible with the current software version but I will rapidly upload any images sent to me - JRY March 2014]
3. Morphotypes and species - if all species were nice and discrete then biostrat would be boringly easy. They aren't though: we know from modern assemblages than biologically separate species can produce very similar coccoliths, and biostrat experience tells us that some arbitrary distinctions are useful. The problem is to keep track of the concepts people are using when things get arbitrary, which is one reason why we have the site.
4. musicus vs sanmiguelensis - what is the difference in size and range; (and is there a reason for applying the name sanmiguelensis to the smaller form)?