Tabulate Neptune Occurrences from a Site

NB To get the correct list of sites you may need to set fossil group and run search, then choose site.
Charts can be very large,and a large screen is useful, you can, however, reduce both depth and width of chart by selecting a limited set of samples.
Copying to excel: if you want to have a table in excel then simply copy and paste. This will work with most browsers, and most spreadsheet programs.

Site:
Fossil Group:
Names for columns:
Sort order
Age min: Age max:
Depth min: Depth max:
Core min: Core max:
Species min: Species max:
highlight duplicate rows?:
off
nReference source date set rows
0Shipboard Scientific Party, 1999. Site 1092. In Gersonde, R., Hodell, D.A., Blum, P., et al., Proc. ODP, Init. Repts., 177: College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program), 1-82. 7102015-02-2627590
1Flores, Jose-Abel; Marino, Maria (2002): Pleistocene calcareous nannofossil stratigraphy for ODP Leg 177 (Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean). Marine Micropaleontology, 45(3-4), 191-2246662015-02-2739169
If more than one reference is listed then the set column can be used to identify which data rows come from which reference.





Age(Ma)mbsf
0 Coccolithus pelagicus (w/ bar)
1 Reticulofenestra pseudoumbilicus?
2 Dictyococcites antarcticus
3 Dictyococcites productus
4 Calcidiscus leptoporus
5 Calcidiscus macintyrei
6
7 Reticulofenestra minutula
8 Reticulofenestra minutula
sample
set
10.07113.08ACAF12_9_28cm275
10.07113.0812_9_28cm391
10.33121.60ACDRR13_9_10cm275
10.33121.60R13_9_10cm391
10.71131.16CDCFFR14_9_10cm275
10.71131.16R14_9_10cm391
11.16141.09FFDAA15_9_14cm275
11.16141.0915_9_14cm391
11.88149.96CCDFCC16_9_14cm275
11.88149.9616_9_14cm391
11.9150.50ACDF17_1_0cm275
11.93151.0017_1_0cm391
11.98152.00CADF17_2_0cm275
11.98152.0017_2_0cm391


Colour coding: this is based on comparing the standard range of the taxon (from the mikrotax database) with the age of the sample (from the Neptune database).
Pink shading - the sample age is too young for the taxon; any occurrences are shown in red - and may be due to reworking.
Green shading - the sample age is correct for the taxon to occur
Grey shading - the sample is too old for the taxon; any occurrences are shown in magenta White/no shading - non-standard taxon and so there is no predicted age-range.