Tabulate Neptune Occurrences from a Site

NB To get the correct list of sites you may need to set fossil group and run search, then choose site.
Charts can be very large,and a large screen is useful, you can, however, reduce both depth and width of chart by selecting a limited set of samples.
Copying to excel: if you want to have a table in excel then simply copy and paste. This will work with most browsers, and most spreadsheet programs.

Site:
Fossil Group:
Names for columns:
Sort order
Age min: Age max:
Depth min: Depth max:
Core min: Core max:
Species min: Species max:
highlight duplicate rows?:
off
nReference source date set rows
0Roth, P.H. 1974. Calcareous Nannofossils from the Northwestern Indian Ocean, Leg 24, Deep Sea Drilling Project; In Fisher, R. L., Bunce, E. T., et al., Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, Volume 24, Washington (U.S. Government Printing Office) 969-994.prior to 201062555
If more than one reference is listed then the set column can be used to identify which data rows come from which reference.





Age(Ma)mbsf
0 Sphenolithus moriformis
1 Discoaster deflandrei
2 Discoaster divaricatus
3 Coccolithus eopelagicus
4 Cyclococcolithus floridanus
5 Reticulofenestra bisecta
6 Reticulofenestra abisecta
7 Triquetrorhabdulus carinatus
8 Sphenolithus capricornutas
9 Helicopontosphaera kamptneri
10 Cyclococcolithina leptopora
11 Discoaster exilis
12 Reticulofenestra pseudoumbilica
13 Sphenolithus heteromorphus
14 Discoaster challengerii
15 Cyclococcolithina macintyrei
16 Triquetrorhabdulus rugosus
17 Discoaster braarudii
18 Discoaster calcaris
19 Discoaster hamatus
20 Discoaster neohamatus
21 Discoaster variabilis
22 Coccolithus pelagicus (q)
sample
set
10.09280.48FCCCFCRCFCCCC30_6_98cm625
10.46291.48CCCFCRRRRFFCFCFFFC32_1_48cm625

Colour coding: this is based on comparing the standard range of the taxon (from the mikrotax database) with the age of the sample (from the Neptune database).
Pink shading - the sample age is too young for the taxon; any occurrences are shown in red - and may be due to reworking.
Green shading - the sample age is correct for the taxon to occur
Grey shading - the sample is too old for the taxon; any occurrences are shown in magenta - these may be due to misidentifications, changing species concepts, downhole contamination or White/no shading - non-standard taxon and so there is no predicted age-range.